Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839024›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography quantitative parameters for predicting pathological complete remission after neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Shaolan Guo, Dandan Wang, Qian Zhao, Zhao Bi, Wanhu Li, Jian Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaolan GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics & Technology, Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Dandan WangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qian ZhaoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Zhao BiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Wanhu LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jian ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology Physics & Technology, Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-4593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is a common cancer among women worldwide, and although the use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for BC has become more widespread, there is no standardized prediction of the efficacy of NAT for BC. This study aimed to evaluate the value of quantitative parameters of dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography (DLCT) in predicting whether BC patients can achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after NAT. Methods: Patients who were first diagnosed with BC in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute and received only NAT before surgery were selected for participation in this study. All breast computed tomography (CT) imaging examinations were performed using DLCT, within 1 week before initiating NAT. The gold standard for evaluating the effect of NAT is pathologic response established at surgery. The Miller-Payne grading system was applied to assess the response to NAT. Quantitative parameters were extracted from DLCT, including CT value, normalized CT value, iodine concentration (IC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curve, effective atomic number, and the normalized effective atomic number. The Mann-Whitney Results: In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n=80), compared with the non-pCR group, the slope of the spectral HU curve, IC, effective atomic number, and NIC of arterial phase in the pCR group were higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); area under the curve (AUC): 0.768, 0.791, 0.834, and 0.770, respectively. In the neoadjuvant targeted therapy group (n=40), compared with the pCR group, the CT value, IC, effective atomic number, and NIC of the arterial phase in the non-pCR group were higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); AUC: 0.844, 0.813, 0.802, and 0.766, respectively. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in DLCT venous phase quantitative parameters between pCR and non-pCR in 70 patients treated with NAT. Conclusions: The study suggested a possibility that DLCT provided a potential tool to develop a model for predicting pCR to NAT in BC.

Indexed as

Breast cancer (BC)dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography (DLCT)neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)pathological complete remissionquantitative parameters

Identifiers

PMID39839024
PMCPMC11744159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.