ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Bibliometric analysis of research on the application of deep learning to ophthalmology.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthcare analytics perspectives on artificial intelligence-based retinopathy of prematurity screening: a bibliometric mapping study.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Pooled it
- Breakthroughs in diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and treatment using preclinical research models: current progress and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence technology in ophthalmology public health: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently, deep learning has become a popular area of research, and has revolutionized the diagnosis and prediction of ocular diseases, especially fundus diseases. This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of deep learning in the field of ophthalmology to describe international research trends and examine the current research directions. Methods: This cross-sectional bibliometric analysis examined the development of research on deep learning in the field of ophthalmology and its sub-topics from 2015 to 2024. Visualization of similarities (VOS)-viewer was used to analyze and evaluate 3,055 articles. Data from the articles were collected on a specific date (September 11, 2024) and downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) in plain-text format. Results: A total of 3,055 relevant articles on the WOSCC published from 2015 to 2024 were included in this analysis. The first article on the application of deep learning to ophthalmology was published in 2015, and the number of articles on the subject has grown significantly since 2019. China was the most productive country (n=1,187), followed by the United States (n=673). Sun Yat-sen University was the institution with the most publications. Cheng and Bogunovic were the most frequently published authors. The following four different clusters were identified based on a co-occurrence cluster analysis of high-frequency keywords: (I) deep learning for the segmentation and feature extraction of ophthalmic images; (II) deep learning for the automatic detection and classification of ophthalmic images; (III) application of deep learning to ophthalmic imaging techniques; and (IV) deep learning for the diagnosis and management of ophthalmic diseases. Conclusions: The analysis of fundus images and the clinical application of deep learning techniques have emerged as prominent research areas in the field of ophthalmology. The substantial increase in publications and citations signifies the expanding impact and global collaboration in the application of deep learning research to ophthalmology. By identifying four distinct clusters representing sub-topics in deep learning ophthalmology research, this study contributes to the understanding of current trends and potential future advancements in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.