Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839010›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

A streamlined U-Net convolution network for medical image processing.

Ching-Hsue Cheng, Jun-He Yang, Yu-Chen Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ching-Hsue ChengDepartment of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-6965
Jun-He YangDepartment of E-Sport Technology Management, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung City.
Yu-Chen HsuDepartment of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Image segmentation is crucial in medical diagnosis, helping to identify diseased areas in images for more accurate diagnoses. The U-Net model, a convolutional neural network (CNN) widely used for medical image segmentation, has limitations in extracting global features and handling multi-scale pathological information. This study aims to address these challenges by proposing a novel model that enhances segmentation performance while reducing computational demands. Methods: We introduce the LUNeXt model, which integrates Vision Transformers (ViT) with a redesigned convolution block structure. This model employs depthwise separable convolutions to capture global features with fewer parameters. Comprehensive experiments were conducted on four diverse medical image datasets to evaluate the model's performance. Results: The LUNeXt model demonstrated competitive segmentation performance with a significant reduction in parameters and floating-point operations (FLOPs) compared to traditional U-Net models. The application of explainable AI techniques provided clear visualization of segmentation results, highlighting the model's efficacy in efficient medical image segmentation. Conclusions: LUNeXt facilitates efficient medical image segmentation on standard hardware, reducing the learning curve and making advanced techniques more accessible to practitioners. This model balances the complexity and parameter count, offering a promising solution for enhancing the accuracy of pathological feature extraction in medical images.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)lightweight modelMedical image segmentationVision Transformers (ViT)

Identifiers

PMID39839010
PMCPMC11744110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.