Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39839009›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

A machine learning model incorporating

Fangansheng Chen, Jia Jiang, Yushi Peng, Ling Wang, Junping Lan, Shuying Bian, Hanzhe Wang, Zhe Xiao, Yimin Chen, Yinuo Fu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gland surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fangansheng Chen *Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jia Jiang *Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Wenling, Taizhou, China.
Yushi PengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ling WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Junping LanDepartment of Radiology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shuying BianDepartment of Radiology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Hanzhe WangDepartment of Radiology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhe XiaoDepartment of Radiology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yimin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yinuo FuWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiangwu ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Kun TangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-0481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although Methods: This retrospective study involved consecutive patients diagnosed with PCa who underwent both preoperative mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT scans between April 2019 and June 2022. Scatter plots and heat maps were employed to determine the correlation of mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT features with preoperative PSA. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used assess the correlation between age, maximum Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), extracapsular extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), total lesion PSMA (PSMA-TL), and PSA persistence. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to develop a predictive model for PSA persistence, while decision tree analysis was used to classify patients into different risk groups for easy interpretation and visualization. We divided the patient cohort into training and validation sets in an 8:2 ratio. To ensure the reliability of the model, we performed five-fold cross-validation of the validation results. Results: Ultimately, this study included 190 patients with PCa. The median age of the patients was 69 years [interquartile range (IQR) 64-73 years]. Among the patients, 35 (18%) experienced PSA persistence following RP. Additionally, SVI was identified in 31 (16%) patients. The median values for SUVmax and PSMA-TL were 11.83 (IQR 7.44-20.89) and 41.92 (IQR 21.25-113.83), respectively. Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the preoperative PSA levels in patients with PCa were slightly correlated with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (r=0.41; P<0.001), significantly correlated with PSMA-TL (r=0.58, P<0.001), and strongly correlated with PSAD (r=0.865, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent predictors of PSA persistence were SVI on mpMRI [area under the curve (AUC)=0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.516-0.739] and PSMA-TL (AUC =0.80; 95% CI: 0.723-0.877) on PSMA PET/CT (all P values <0.05). Patients with SVI and PSMA-TL >63.38 cm Conclusions:

Indexed as

18F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT)multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)prostate cancerprostate-specific antigen persistence (PSA persistence)Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)

Identifiers

PMID39839009
PMCPMC11744181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.