Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838943›Full record

ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2025

RF Heating Effects in CEST NMR with Hyperpolarized

David Hernandez-Solarte, Leif Schröder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. RF Heating Effects in CEST NMR with HyperpolarizedChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David Hernandez-SolarteDivision of Translational Molecular Imaging, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Leif SchröderDivision of Translational Molecular Imaging, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-0325

Funding

BIOQIC 289347353BIOQIC 316693477BIOQIC SCHR 995/5-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) GRK 2260Dieter Morszeck Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) improves the sensitivity of NMR but depending on the spin exchange kinetics, it can require substantial RF energy deposition to label magnetization. Potential side effects like RF-induced heating may occur and must be monitored. Here, we explore the parameter space considering not only undesired heating but also efficient CEST build-up (depolarization rate), spectral resolution (line width), and subsequent effects like changes in chemical shifts of CEST responses. We present a systematic study to compare conventional block pulse with shaped-pulse saturation and quantify how the effective average saturation power impacts these parameters. Pulse shape and nominal excitation bandwidth, however, turned out to have little impact on acquired z-spectra and temperature changes. This study illustrates how different exchange kinetics define different regimes of suitable RF power within the dynamic range of fully saturable magnetization from hyperpolarized

Indexed as

CESTHyperpolarized xenonNMRRF heating

Identifiers

PMID39838943
PMCPMC12005132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.