Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838896›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2025

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of generic tacrolimus (Suprotac

Behzad Einollahi, Mohsen Nafar, Mohammad Javanbakht, Amirhesam Alirezaei, Jalal Azmandian, Abbas Etminan, Mohammad Reza Ardalan, Jalal Etemadi, Roghayeh Akbari, Vahid Pourfarziani and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Behzad EinollahiNephrology and Urology Research Center, Clinical Science Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. behzadeinollahi@finmail.com.
Mohsen NafarChronic Kidney Disease Research Center, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. m.nafar.md@gmail.com.
Mohammad JavanbakhtNephrology and Urology Research Center, Clinical Science Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. mhmjvbt81@gmail.com.
Amirhesam AlirezaeiDepartment of Nephrology, Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. amirhesam124@gmail.com.
Jalal AzmandianPhysiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman. J-Azmandian@yahoo.com.
Abbas EtminanPhysiology Research Center, Departments of Nephrology, Urology and Renal Transplantation, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman. abbas_etminan@yahoo.com.
Mohammad Reza ArdalanKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz. ardalan34@yahoo.com.
Jalal EtemadiKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz. jalaletemadi@yahoo.com.
Roghayeh AkbariInfectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol. roghayeh.akbari@yahoo.com.
Vahid PourfarzianiNephrology and Urology Research Center, Clinical Science Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. pourfarziani@gmail.com.
Seyed Sadraddin Rasi HashemiKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz. S_rasihashemi@yahoo.com.
Seyed Maryam RahbarDepartment of Nephrology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. mrahbar@tums.ac.ir.
Shahrzad ShahidiIsfahan Kidney Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan. shahidi_shahrzad@yahoo.com.
Javid SafaKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz. drsafa2003@yahoo.com.
Hamid Tayyebi KhosroshahiKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz. drtayebikh@yahoo.com.
Sima Abedi AzarKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz. Sima_abedi@yahoo.com.
Shahrzad OssarehNephrology Section, Department of Medicine, Hasheminejad Kidney Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. ossareh_s@hotmail.com.
Abdolamir AtapourIsfahan Kidney Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan. atapour@med.mui.ac.ir.
Bahareh MarghoobNephrology Section, Department of Medicine, Hasheminejad Kidney Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. baharehmarghoob@yahoo.com.
Fatemeh NazemianDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Nazemianf@mums.ac.ir.
Hamidreza KafiMedical Department, Orchid Pharmed Company, Tehran. Kafi.H@orchidpharmed.com.
Araz SabzvariCinnaGen Medical Biotechnology Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj. sabzvari.a@orchidpharmed.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplant recipients are given an immunosuppressive regimen such as tacrolimus to prevent organ rejection. Suprotac® is a generic tacrolimus that is utilized in kidney transplantation regimen in Iran. This post-market study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Suprotac® in comparison with Prograf®. In this two-armed, open-label, parallel, active-controlled, and cohort study, de novo kidney transplant recipients aging 18 to 65 years were prescribed Suprotac® or Prograf® as part of the immunosuppressant protocol. The primary outcome was comparing the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at month 12. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of patient and graft survival, acute rejections during hospitalization, tacrolimus dose, trough concentration, and Trough Concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, and Adverse Events (AEs) during the study period. A total of 201 patients were enrolled in this study. At discharge, the eGFR was lower in the Suprotac® group compared to the Prograf® group (51.70 ml/min/1.73m2 and 57.48 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively; p=0.042). However, at month 12, there was no significant difference in mean eGFR between the two groups (58.94 ml/min/1.73m2 and 59.78 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively; p=0.772). Other outcomes, including patient and graft survival, acute rejection during hospitalization, tacrolimus dose, trough concentration, and C/D ratio, and overall incidence of AEs were similar between the two groups (p >0.05). The efficacy and safety profile of the generic tacrolimus were shown to be comparable to the reference tacrolimus at month 12.

Identifiers

PMID39838896
PMCPMC12038561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.