Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838890›Full record

ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2025

Melatonin: A Review of the Evidence for Use in Hospital Settings.

Josephine A Adattini, Carly Wills, Jennifer H Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josephine A AdattiniMedication Safety (Formulary) Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-7910
Carly WillsMedication Safety (Formulary) Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer H MartinMedication Safety (Formulary) Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-0199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New onset insomnia is often experienced by patients during hospitalization due to environmental disruptions, pain and increased patient care activities. Patient distress arising from poor sleep quality and quantity often results in the prescribing of hypnotics. Melatonin use in hospital settings is common and is increasingly used for off label indications including primary insomnia in those aged < 55 years, prevention of delirium and to facilitate benzodiazepine discontinuation. A literature review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness of melatonin for various off-label indications in inpatient hospital settings. The review found limited high quality evidence demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit from melatonin in improving sleep, delirium, or facilitating benzodiazepine discontinuation in the inpatient setting. Study findings were inconsistent, and those that did show statistical improvement were of uncertain clinical benefit. The review also found a paucity of data on the safety of melatonin when used in hospitalized patients, and no evidence to support cost-effectiveness. Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as first-line treatment of insomnia and for the prevention of delirium in inpatient settings. The use of interventions without evidence for efficacy or effectiveness is contrary to the quality use of medicines principles in Australia's National Medicines Policy. Context-specific evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of a medicine should guide clinician decision-making and prescribing, to improve the quality use of medicines.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesMelatoninSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisDeliriumHospitalizationHumansOff-Label UseHypnotics and SedativesMelatonin

Identifiers

PMID39838890
PMCPMC11751625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.