ArticleBiology letters2025
Female gorillas form highly stable dominance relationships.
Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Succession Dominates Alpha Male Replacement in Despotic Rhesus Monkeys: Insights from a Long-Term Study in the Taihang Mountains, Henan Province, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
- Female gorillas form highly stable dominance relationships.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals commonly form dominance relationships that determine the priority of access to resources and influence fitness. Dominance relationships based on age, immigration order or nepotism (alliances with kin) conventions are usually more stable than those based on intrinsic characteristics such as physical strength. Unlike most mammals, female gorillas disperse from their groups, typically more than once in their lifetimes, disrupting their group tenures and/or any alliances. Thus, we predicted that they form unstable dominance relationships that are not based on conventions. Contrarily, using a 24-year dataset on five groups of both gorilla species, we found that females form strikingly stable dominance relationships, maintained over their whole co-residence in a group (mean dyadic co-residence = 4.8, max = 17.3 years). Specifically, we observed rank reversals in only two out of 92 female dyads, and all other rank improvements resulted from emigration or death of higher-ranking females (passive mobility). These results mirror observations in chimpanzees, suggesting that dominance dynamics might have deep roots in hominid evolution. Our study challenges a hypothesized link between hierarchy instability and dispersal, particularly among animals in which fitness consequences of rank improvement may not be great enough to counterbalance the potentially high costs of challenging higher-ranking individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.