ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Adenomyosis-Induced Urinary Retention: Case Analysis and Clinical Implications.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute urinary retention (AUR) is relatively rare in non-pregnant women and is usually associated with lower urinary tract dysfunction, neurological issues, or pelvic organ compression. Adenomyosis is a common gynecologic condition characterized by the invasion of endometrial glands and stroma into the myometrium, often accompanied by symptoms such as dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual periods. Although adenomyosis is common, its involvement in causing urinary retention is rare but deserves clinical attention. CASE REPORT We report the case of a patient with recurrent urinary retention due to adenomyosis, who had a 20-year history of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. Imaging revealed significant thickening of the posterior uterine wall and a globular increase in size. Due to the ineffectiveness of conservative treatment, the patient ultimately underwent a total hysterectomy via laparoscopy. After the operation, the patient's urinary retention symptoms completely disappeared, her urinary function quickly returned to normal, and her postoperative follow-up showed no recurrence of urinary retention or other urinary-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Although adenomyosis is common in women, acute urinary retention remains rare. This case report suggests that clinicians should consider adenomyosis as a potential cause alongside other common causes of recurrent or unexplained urinary retention in female patients, particularly in those presenting with classic symptoms such as prolonged dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. The successful treatment of this case further highlights the importance of an individualized treatment plan, as total hysterectomy can effectively relieve symptoms and improve the patient's quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.