Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838595›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of medicine2025

Cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Huibin Yang, Ting An, Yuxuan Zhao, Xiaojing Shi, Bangmao Wang, Qingyu Zhang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huibin YangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0009-0004-9238-575X
Ting AnDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yuxuan ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaojing ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bangmao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qingyu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveJanus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKinibs) are effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their cardiovascular safety is inconclusive. We aim to assess the cardiovascular risks associated with JAKinibs in IBD patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsSystematic searches of seven databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 2024 were conducted. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism events (VTE) and cardiovascular events (CVE), which were separately evaluated based on whether or not the dose was considered. P-score was applied to rank interventions.

resultsA total of 26 trials involving 10,537 IBD patients were included, and results showed no significantly increased risk of MACE, VTE and CVE was associated with JAKinibs. However, when the dose was considered, Tofacitinib 5 mg BID (versus placebo) showed a trend towards an increased risk of MACE [odds ratio (OR)=1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-4.82], as well as Upadacitinib 30 mg QD (versus placebo) showed a trend towards increased risks of VTE (OR=1.36, 95% CI: 0.23-8.03) and CVE (OR=1.08, 95% CI: 0.24-4.85), and ranked higher than placebo for the risk of VTE [P-score=0.766 (versus 0.722)]. Notably, Deucravacitinib ranked lowest for all cardiovascular risks, and significantly decreased the risks of VTE (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.87) and CVE (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.87) compared with placebo.

conclusionsAlthough a trend of increased cardiovascular risks was found considering dose, no significantly increased cardiovascular risk was associated with JAKinibs in IBD patients, and Deucravacitinib significantly decreased the risks of VTE and CVE.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesJanus Kinase InhibitorsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansPiperidinesPyrimidinesVenous ThromboembolismHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus Kinase InhibitorsPiperidinesPyrimidinestofacitinibupadacitinibInflammatory bowel diseaseJanus kinase inhibitormajor adverse cardiovascular eventsnetwork meta-analysisvenous thromboembolism events

Identifiers

PMID39838595
PMCPMC11755742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.