Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838587›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery2025

When neck lymph nodes metastases do not origin from a head and neck unknown primary.

Erim Pamuk, Christian Simon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erim PamukService d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie - Chirurgie cervico-faciale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christian Simon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe evidence for a standardized approach to the management of cervical metastasis from a distant primary tumour is limited. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current status of research in this field and to present the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. RECENT

findingsAlthough infraclavicular tumours are typically observed to metastasise to levels IV and V of the neck, all levels may potentially be affected. In conjunction with imaging and immunohistochemical analyses, next-generation sequencing and artificial intelligence-based tools are emerging as potential methods for identifying the primary tumour. Cervical metastasis can be classified as N3 or M1 in accordance with the histology and site of the primary tumour. A neck dissection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may prove beneficial in selected patients with breast, nonsmall cell lung, renal cell, oesophageal and testicular cancers, resulting in improved survival rates. SUMMARY: The diagnosis and subsequent treatment of such cases requires the input of a multidisciplinary team, as the condition is often complex and requires a multifaceted approach. Isolated supraclavicular metastases should prompt the clinician to investigate a distant primary. In select patients with some types of primary tumours, surgical treatment of the neck may improve the prognosis. It is, therefore, essential to control the primary tumour in order to optimize the success of the overall treatment plan.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeckNeck DissectionPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39838587
PMCPMC11888826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.