Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838551›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025

Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Erbium YAG Laser Along With Normal Saline vs. Its Combination With Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Treatment of Striae Distensae: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Zeinab Mahdi, Sona Zare, Abbas Dehghani, Azadeh Goodarzi, Niloufar Najar Nobari, Roya Zeinali, Maryam Nouri, Zahra Ebrahimi, Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advances in the Treatment of Striae Distensae.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Masoumeh RoohaninasabDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Zeinab MahdiDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Sona ZareSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-6717
Abbas DehghaniDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-3606
Azadeh GoodarziDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-4429
Niloufar Najar NobariDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4245-1980
Roya ZeinaliDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-8111
Maryam NouriSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-3232
Zahra EbrahimiDepartment of General Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Ali NilforoushzadehSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-8039
Elham BehrangiDepartment of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6545-3460

Funding

Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no definitive solution for the treatment of striae distensae (SD), and effectiveness of each treatment method remains controversial. We aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy of the combination of Erbium YAG (Er:YAG) laser and stromal vascular fraction (SVF), the combination of Er:YAG laser and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Er:YAG laser plus saline in the treatment of SD. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 12 participating patients with at least three lesions (36 lesions in total), each lesion was treated with an Er:YAG laser. SVF was randomly injected intradermally for the first lesion, PRP for the second lesion, and normal saline as placebo for the third lesion. Treatment duration was one session, and the safety and efficacy of the treatment was assessed 3 months later using the following items: evaluation of biometric parameters including corneometery, erythema, melanin, tewametery, color, cutometery, complete thickness, epidermal thickness, dermal thickness, complete density, epidermal density, and dermal density; assessment of patient and physician satisfaction using Likert score; and recording of adverse effects of treatment.

resultsThe study involved 12 patients (evaluating 36 lesions in total), predominantly women (83%), with an average age of 39.16 years. The analysis revealed significant improvements in biometric indices, including complete thickness, epidermal thickness, dermal thickness, and R5 cutometer readings across all groups after the intervention. Notably, the SVF and PRP groups showed statistically significant enhancements in dermal and complete density compared to the placebo group. The SVF group demonstrated a significant increase in epidermal density (from 45.95 to 51.19, p = 0.001), unlike the PRP and placebo groups which showed nonsignificant changes. Comparing the average changes in biometric factors, the SVF group exhibited significantly greater increases in complete thickness, dermal thickness, complete density, epidermal density, and dermal density than the other groups. Both patient and physician satisfaction scores were highest in the SVF group (p = 0.001), with no significant posttreatment complications reported.

conclusionOur results showed that the combination of Er:YAG laser and SVF injection could be considered an effective and safe treatment method in the treatment of SD.

trial registrationIRCT20200127046282N14.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesLasers, Solid-StateLow-Level Light TherapyPlatelet-Rich PlasmaStriae DistensaeAdultCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSaline SolutionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultSaline Solutionclinical trialefficacyerbium YAG laserEr:YAGplatelet‐rich plasmaPRPsafetystriae distensaestromal vascular fractionSVF

Identifiers

PMID39838551
PMCPMC11751379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.