ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
Colorectal Cancer Surgery at a Regional Cold Site Centre During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Comparison With Prepandemic Practices.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionStockholm, Sweden had among the highest excess mortality rates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In March 2020, an entire hospital implemented an infection-free cold site infrastructure and scaled up imperative mainly colorectal cancer surgery, for the Stockholm health care region. The study evaluated the efficacy of the concept.
methodsStrict preadmission screening and prophylactic interventions were implemented. The outcomes of the cold site cohort (30th March-21st June 2020) were compared to a prepandemic control. Population-based data on colorectal cancer patients were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.
resultsThere were 107 patients in the cold site cohort and 109 in the control cohort. None developed COVID-19 within 30 days postoperatively. The proportions of pelvic and laparoscopic surgery were similar. The cold site cohort had more potentially avoidable stomas (32/94 (34%) vs 19/91 (21%), p = 0.0442). In the region, the proportion of colorectal cancer resections at the cold site increased from prepandemic 12.9% (58 of 448) to 43.3% (94 of 217) (p < 0.001).
conclusionA SARS-CoV-2-cold site can be kept infection-free by screening, allowing increased volumes of colorectal cancer surgery with outcomes comparable to prepandemic practice. The cold site model should be more widely adopted in future similar scenarios. SUMMARY: This study reports on the implementation of an entire cold site hospital for imperative colorectal surgery, in particular colorectal cancer, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. By comparing outcomes to prepandemic practices, we demonstrated that the cold site hospital was effective in preventing infection and safely increasing surgical volume many-fold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.