ReviewAnnals of botany2025
Toward a comprehensive understanding of the phenological responses of non-native plants to climate warming: a review.
Review in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlants often shift their phenology in response to climate warming, with potentially important ecological consequences. Relative differences in the abilities of native and non-native plants to track warming temperatures by adjusting their phenologies could have cascading consequences for ecosystems. Our general understanding of non-native species leads us to believe these species may be more phenologically sensitive than native species, but evidence for this has been mixed, likely due, in part, to the myriad of diverse ecological contexts in which non-natives have been studied. SCOPE: Here, we review the current state of knowledge on non-native plant phenological responses to climate warming. From observational and experimental studies, we synthesize: (1) the ways in which non-native plant phenology shifts with increased temperature, (2) the relative differences between natives and non-natives in phenological timing and sensitivity to warming, (3) the contingencies driving variable non-native phenological responses to warming, and (4) the ecological consequences of warming-induced phenological shifts in non-natives.
conclusionsEarly-season phenophases tend to advance with warming, sometimes (but not always) more so in non-native species relative to native species. Late-season phenophases, on the other hand, tend to be more variable: advancing, delaying, or remaining unchanged. Similarly, relative differences in phenological sensitivity between native and non-native plants were less consistent for late-season phenophases. However, our ability for inference is limited by the scope of studies done to date, which best represent temperate ecosystems in the Northern Hemisphere. We found phenological shifts in non-native species to be driven by various factors, including their evolutionary histories and the environmental context of the invaded system. Shifts in non-native phenologies result in varied ecological consequences, from shifting demographics of the non-native species themselves to changes in ecosystem level processes such as carbon cycling. Additional study addressing key gaps is vital to improving understanding of non-native phenological responses to warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.