ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
A comparative analysis in monitoring 24-hour urinary copper in wilson disease: sampling on or off treatment?
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of novel assays of non-ceruloplasmin copper to monitor chelation treatment in patients with Wilson disease.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Trial
- Relative Exchangeable and Exchangeable Copper: Emerging New Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring in Wilson's Disease.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Management of Wilson disease across Europe: an international physician-oriented survey by the ERN-RARE Liver group.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Predictive value of liver enzymes in long-term prognosis of hepatic Wilson disease: results from the Wilson AEEH registry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimTwenty-four-hour urinary copper excretion (24 h-UCE) is the standard diagnostic tool for dose adjustments in maintenance therapy in Wilson disease (WD) patients. Guidelines lack data if both variants of 24 h-UCE measurement (with or without 48 h of treatment interruption) are equally interpretable.
methodsEighty-four patients with a confirmed diagnosis of WD treated with chelators (50% of patients with D-Penicillamine and 50% with trientine) and with pairwise 24-h-UCE values on-therapy and off-therapy were included in the analysis. Pairwise urinary sampling between October 2022 (T0) and a 12-month FU (T2) was compared, and exchangeable copper (CuEXC) was additionally measured at T0.
resultsAmong the 84 patients, 65% had predominant hepatic symptoms, the median age was 42 years, and 58% were female. At T0, patients were in the stable maintenance phase, with a median treatment duration of 21.9 years. The levels of the biochemical markers liver and copper metabolism remained stable over the 12-month observation period for all patients. 24 h-UCE off-therapy significantly decreased from T0 to T2 (p = 0.03), whereas no statistically significant differences were detected for 24 h-UCE after therapy. Both sampling methods did not correlate. CuEXC was significantly correlated with 24 h-UCE after 48 h of dose interruption (p = 0.018) but not with 24 h-UCE after therapy. A total of 46% of the 24 h-UCE value pairs were discordant, laying out the aimed therapeutic ranges given in current international guidelines.
conclusionOff-therapy 24 h-UCE reflects the "free" copper pool more accurately than does urinary sampling. The study shows discordant results for both sampling methods in approximately half of the patients, revealing that interpretation of 24 h-UCE with respect to chelator-dosing decisions should be performed with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.