Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838467›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025

A comparative analysis in monitoring 24-hour urinary copper in wilson disease: sampling on or off treatment?

Isabelle Mohr, Patrick Lamade, Christophe Weber, Viola Leidner, Sebastian Köhrer, Alexander Olkus, Matthias Lang, Andrea Langel, Patrischia Dankert, Melanie Greibich and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Relative Exchangeable and Exchangeable Copper: Emerging New Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring in Wilson's Disease.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Isabelle MohrInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. isabelle.mohr@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-0241
Patrick LamadeInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Christophe WeberInternal Medicine III Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Viola LeidnerInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Sebastian KöhrerInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Alexander OlkusInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Matthias LangInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Andrea LangelInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Patrischia DankertInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Melanie GreibichInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Silke WolfInternal Medicine I, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Holger ZimmerInternal Medicine I, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick MichlInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Aurélia PoujoisDepartment of Neurology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, National Reference Center for Wilson Disease, Paris, France.
Karl Heinz WeissInternal Medicine, Salem Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uta MerleInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimTwenty-four-hour urinary copper excretion (24 h-UCE) is the standard diagnostic tool for dose adjustments in maintenance therapy in Wilson disease (WD) patients. Guidelines lack data if both variants of 24 h-UCE measurement (with or without 48 h of treatment interruption) are equally interpretable.

methodsEighty-four patients with a confirmed diagnosis of WD treated with chelators (50% of patients with D-Penicillamine and 50% with trientine) and with pairwise 24-h-UCE values on-therapy and off-therapy were included in the analysis. Pairwise urinary sampling between October 2022 (T0) and a 12-month FU (T2) was compared, and exchangeable copper (CuEXC) was additionally measured at T0.

resultsAmong the 84 patients, 65% had predominant hepatic symptoms, the median age was 42 years, and 58% were female. At T0, patients were in the stable maintenance phase, with a median treatment duration of 21.9 years. The levels of the biochemical markers liver and copper metabolism remained stable over the 12-month observation period for all patients. 24 h-UCE off-therapy significantly decreased from T0 to T2 (p = 0.03), whereas no statistically significant differences were detected for 24 h-UCE after therapy. Both sampling methods did not correlate. CuEXC was significantly correlated with 24 h-UCE after 48 h of dose interruption (p = 0.018) but not with 24 h-UCE after therapy. A total of 46% of the 24 h-UCE value pairs were discordant, laying out the aimed therapeutic ranges given in current international guidelines.

conclusionOff-therapy 24 h-UCE reflects the "free" copper pool more accurately than does urinary sampling. The study shows discordant results for both sampling methods in approximately half of the patients, revealing that interpretation of 24 h-UCE with respect to chelator-dosing decisions should be performed with caution.

Indexed as

CopperHepatolenticular DegenerationAdolescentAdultChelating AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPenicillamineTrientineYoung AdultChelating AgentsCopperPenicillamineTrientineExchangeable copperMonitoringUrinary copperWilson disease

Identifiers

PMID39838467
PMCPMC11748325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.