Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838404›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

"If that would have lessened my symptoms, that would have been great...": a qualitative study about the acceptability of tecovirimat as treatment for mpox.

Sara Paparini, Rosalie Hayes, Benjamin Weil, Will Nutland, Ismael Maatouk, Teodora Wi, Chloe M Orkin, Rosamund Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara PapariniWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. s.paparini@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-2481
Rosalie HayesWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4046-4101
Benjamin WeilThe Love Tank CIC, London, UK.
Will NutlandThe Love Tank CIC, London, UK.
Ismael MaatoukDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1008-7413
Teodora WiDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7640-9166
Chloe M Orkin *SHARE Collaborative, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-6745
Rosamund Lewis *Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-2545

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTecovirimat, an antiviral treatment for smallpox, was approved as a treatment for mpox by the European Medicines Agency in January 2022. Approval was granted under "exceptional circumstances" based on effectiveness found in pre-clinical challenge studies in animals and safety studies in humans showing minimal side effects. As clinical efficacy studies are still ongoing, there is currently limited information with regard to the acceptability of tecovirimat to treat mpox. The aim of this study is to understand prospective acceptability of use of tecovirimat as treatment for mpox.

methodsA co-produced, qualitative, focus group study design was conducted with a theoretically informed sample of people from communities at higher risk and with experience of mpox illness. Thirteen participants took part: all self-identified as cisgender male, 1 self-identified as Black British, 1 as British Asian, 5 as White, 3 as White British, 3 as White Other. Inclusion criteria were as follows: experience of mpox illness; age 18 and over; living in the United Kingdom (UK); living in the UK during 2022 mpox outbreak. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a combination inductive and deductive coding informed by the Treatment Acceptability Framework.

resultsVery few participants were aware of tecovirimat as a treatment option and none were offered it during their mpox illness. Key factors influencing acceptability found in this study were as follows: levels of trust in medicine; level of information; provider communication approach; quality of experience of mpox care. Marginalised communities at highest risk of mpox may have prior experience of structural discrimination which can greatly influence treatment acceptability.

conclusionsThis exploratory study suggest that offering tecovirimat (or comparable emergency-licensed treatments) to people with mpox is acceptable, although uptake will depend on knowledge of mpox treatment options, trust in medicine and medical professionals and provision of relevant information and choice. To increase acceptability of such treatments, clinicians should ensure patients are aware of mpox symptom management options, including pain relief; acknowledge and address patient concerns upfront and within the context of non-stigmatising care; and communicate offers in a consistent and supportive manner in line with locally approved eligibility criteria and protocols at the time.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBenzamidesIsoindolesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMpox, MonkeypoxPhthalimidesProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomAntiviral AgentsBenzamidesIsoindolesPhthalimidestecovirimatAcceptabilityMpoxQualitativeTecovirimatTreatment acceptability framework

Identifiers

PMID39838404
PMCPMC11753158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.