Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Prehospital lactate analysis in suspected sepsis improves detection of patients with increased mortality risk: an observational study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic value of CT-quantified visceral and subcutaneous fat areas in sepsis.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Lactate-to-albumin ratio as a short‑term prognostic biomarker in atrial fibrillation.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Combined With Lactate for Early Detection of Sepsis in Prehospital Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Association Between Lactate and ICU-Acquired Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Study Using the MIMIC-IV Database.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Lactate trajectories and outcomes in critically ill patients with septic shock: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The lactate-to-albumin ratio as a potential biomarker for acute kidney injury risk in critically ill patients with heart failure: a retrospective study with real-world external validation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Shengmai Injection as adjunctive therapy in sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Combined lactate, base excess, and MEWS score as predictors of ICU transfer from the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The lactate-to-albumin ratio as a potential biomarker for short-term mortality risk in critically ill patients with urosepsis: a retrospective study with dual-cohort validation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Performance of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in pre-hospital critical care to predict short-term mortality: a prospective, multicentre, validation cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- The significance of glycemic variability in conjunction with lactate metabolism levels in the clinical assessment of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lactate and lactylation in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: clinical evidence from the MIMIC-IV database and mechanistic insights.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid, adequate treatment is crucial to reduce mortality in sepsis. Risk stratification scores used at emergency departments (ED) are limited in detecting all septic patients with increased mortality risk. We assessed whether the addition of prehospital lactate analysis to clinical risk stratification tools improves detection of patients with increased risk for rapid deterioration and death in sepsis.
methodsA10-month observational study with consecutive, prospective prehospital inclusion of adult patients with suspected sepsis. Prehospital lactate was used as a continuous variable and in intervals. Analyses of patient subgroups with high and lower priorities according to Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System (RETTS) and National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) were performed. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality, secondary outcomes were sepsis at the ED and in-hospital mortality.
resultsIn all, 714 patients were included with a 30-day mortality of 10%. Among the 322 cases (45%) fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria, the 30-day mortality was 14%. Prehospital lactate was higher among non-survivors (2.6 vs 2.0 mmol/L, p < 0.001). Mortality at different lactate intervals were: 6.7%, at 0-2 mmol/l; 10.0% at > 2-3 mmol/l; 19.2% at > 3-4 mmol/l; and 17.0% at levels > 4 mmol/l. The highest RETTS priority (red) group had higher lactate levels than the lower (non-red) priority group (2.5 vs 1.9 mmol/L, p < 0.001). In the non-red group, prehospital lactate was higher among non-survivors (2.4 vs 1.8 mmol/L, p = 0.002). In the multivariable regression analysis, prehospital lactate > 3 mmol/l was a predictor of 30-day mortality (OR 2.20, p = 0.009) This association was even stronger in the lower priority RETTS non-red group (OR 3.02, p = 0.009). Adding prehospital lactate > 3 mmol/l increased identification of non-survivors from 48 to 68% in the RETTS red group and from 77 to 85% for the NEWS2 ≥ 7 group.
conclusionThe addition of a prehospital lactate level > 3 mmol/l improved early recognition of individuals with increased mortality risk in a cohort with suspected sepsis admitted to the ED. This was particularly evident in patients whose risk stratification scores did not indicate severe illness. We suggest that the addition of prehospital lactate analysis could improve recognition of subjects with suspected sepsis and increased mortality risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.