Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838365›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Pilot study of a ketogenic diet in bipolar disorder: a process evaluation.

Benjamin P Rigby, Nicole Needham, Helen Grossi, Ivana Kamenska, Iain H Campbell, Ben Meadowcroft, Frances Creasy, Cheryl Fisher, Pankaj Bahuguna, John Norrie and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Benjamin P RigbyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. benjamin.rigby@newcastle.ac.uk.
Nicole NeedhamDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Helen GrossiDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
Ivana KamenskaUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Iain H CampbellDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ben MeadowcroftPsychiatry, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Frances CreasyPsychiatry, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Cheryl FisherDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
Pankaj BahugunaHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
John NorrieUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gerard ThompsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Melissa C GibbsNuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maja Mitchell-GrigorjevaBipolar Scotland, Paisley, UK.
Ailsa McLellanDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
Tessa MosesEdinOmics Research Facility (RRID: SCR_021838), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Karl BurgessCentre for Engineering Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel BrownCentre for Engineering Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael J ThrippletonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry CampbellUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Daniel J SmithDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sharon A SimpsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates SPHSU16URKI Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBipolar disorder is a serious mental illness, which requires new strategies for prevention and management. Recent evidence suggests that a ketogenic diet may be an effective intervention. This research aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a ketogenic diet intervention for bipolar disorder, fidelity to its behavioural components and the experiences of the participants and research clinicians involved.

methodsA mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted. Semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with 15 participants 1-2 months after completing a 6-8 week modified ketogenic diet intervention, and 4 research clinicians from the study team following the completion of data collection. Data were thematically analysed. Fidelity checklists completed by research dietitians were analysed using descriptive count and percentage statistics. Findings are reported post-hoc, following the analysis and publication of the main pilot study findings. Reporting was guided by the COREQ checklist.

resultsFive themes were identified in the qualitative data: (1) 'Encouraging entry and supporting exit' (e.g. recognising and managing participants' varied motives and expectations, including around weight loss and symptom alleviation); (2) 'Challenging but potentially transformational,' which reflects that while it can be difficult to initiate and maintain a ketogenic diet day-to-day, many participants perceived physical and psychological benefits (e.g. significant weight loss, mood stability and enhanced ability to focus); (3) 'Intervention facilitators,' including a range of behavioural (e.g. goal setting), social (e.g. family and dietitians) and technological (e.g. apps for monitoring) support mechanisms; (4) 'Intervention barriers' (e.g. dietary preferences, concerns about the diet and its impact, the testing burden and capacity of the delivery team); and (5) 'The wider context' (e.g. the cost of living and sociocultural expectations) was a crucial factor explaining differential experiences. Overall, descriptive analyses indicated moderate-to-good fidelity to the behaviour change components of the study.

conclusionWe provide novel insight into the experiences of people living with bipolar disorder initiating and following a ketogenic diet, as well as those of research clinicians who support the intervention. Future trials may benefit from increased clinical research capacity, better-defined entry and exit routes, additional interpersonal support, and greater understanding of how social and societal factors impact participation.

trial registrationStudy registration number: ISRCTN61613198 (02/03/22).

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderDiet, KetogenicAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBipolar type I or II disordersMetabolic psychiatryNeurophysiologyProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39838365
PMCPMC11752864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.