ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Outcomes of OCT imaging-based reoperations in strabismus.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical profile and associated sociodemographic factors of newly diagnosed strabismus presenting to a tertiary care center in India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- StrabNet-CQ: an integrated deep learning framework for automated strabismus classification and quantification using ocular landmark detection.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical application of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in ocular emergencies: A comprehensive review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReoperations in strabismus are reportedly needed in 20-40% of cases undergoing surgery. The present study investigated the outcomes of reoperations based on preoperative imaging of extraocular muscle insertions, and whether the Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) was of value.
methodsPatients with strabismus requiring reoperation with/without previous surgical records at the Advanced Eye Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh were recruited. All patients underwent a thorough clinical examination and imaging of extraocular muscle insertions on the Swept Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. The accuracy of measuring muscle insertions with the ASOCT was compared with intraoperative caliper readings.
resultsForty-seven muscles (28 patients) were imaged on ASOCT with confirmation intraoperatively during re-operation. The mean age of the patients was 21.6 ± 5.6 years. After looking at the imaging findings, the decision of which muscle to operate on changed in eleven patients (39.2%). The accuracy of ASOCT to measure muscle insertion ± 1 mm was seen in 78.7% (38/47 muscles). The ASOCT could give additional information, such as a slipped muscle and stretched scar in three patients.
conclusionsImaging can be beneficial in achieving successful results in strabismus reoperations with high accuracy. It can be pivotal in surgical planning in reoperations (~ 40%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.