ArticleBMC public health2025
The epidemiology and unmet need of migraine in five european countries: results from the national health and wellness survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Long-term safety of CGRP pathway inhibitors in migraine patients with prior cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Migraine in the Corporate Sector: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Job Efficiency Impact, and Management Strategies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Self-medication and pain in the European Union: Gender differences and associated factors.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Building bridges in migraine management: consensus pathways on best practices across primary and specialist care in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- International Headache Week 2026: March 15-21.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Geographical patterns and determinants of migraine in persons aged ten years or older living in Sweden from 2015 to 2023: a nationwide cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Association between TNFa rs1800629 and migraine: Case-control study and updated meta-analysis.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Article
- Concurrent Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome and Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissection in the Postpartum Period: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Potential Roles of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 (GPR30) in Migraine Pathophysiology.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Chronic migraine management with onabotulinumtoxinA and anti-CGRP/R monoclonal antibodies in an Italian real-world setting: update on therapeutic appropriateness and an emerging role of pharmacy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Headache in the elderly: a retrospective study in a tertiary headache center.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- The use of triptans and other acute treatments for the management of migraine in routine clinical practice in England: a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Trends in the Burden of Headache Disorders in Europe, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence, disability, and economic impact of migraine in Spain: a nationwide population-based study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy for migraine is not associated with early adverse bone effects: a prospective, observational, controlled, cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Migraine epidemiology, comorbidities and therapeutic landscape: a national population-based study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the high global prevalence, burden, and direct and indicated costs, migraines are often under-diagnosed and undertreated. Understanding the prevalence of migraine and unmet needs is crucial for improving diagnosis and treatment across Europe (EU) countries; however, real-world studies are limited.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional survey utilized weighted patient-reported data from the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) in five EU (5EU) countries (France, Germany, United Kingdom [UK], Italy, and Spain). The survey included adults aged ≥ 18 years who self-reported experiencing migraines in the past 12 months and had a physician's diagnosis. The survey assessed migraine prevalence by age and sex. Other measures included migraine characteristics, disability assessment, migraine frequency (monthly migraine days [MMDs] and monthly headache days [MHDs], menstrually-related migraine, treatment patterns, and provider characteristics.
resultsThe study included 7,311 respondents with diagnosed migraines, representing an estimated 30.5 million adults with a weighted prevalence of 11.5% in the 5EU. Spain had the highest prevalence (14.0%), followed by Italy, France, UK, and Germany. Migraine prevalence was highest in the age group of 30-39 years, and females had nearly twice the prevalence compared to males. About 56% of respondents reported disability due to migraines, with highest percentage reported in Germany (66.0%). About 46% of female respondents reported experiencing menstrually-related migraines. One-fourth of the study respondents reported > 4 MMDs and 56.2% reported > 4 MHD. Current treatment patterns revealed that 79.7% of respondents were receiving some form of migraine treatment, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics, and triptans being the most commonly reported prescription medications. Primary care physicians (PCPs) were the most common providers diagnosing migraines, followed by neurologists.
conclusionsIn the 5EU, one-fourth of diagnosed respondents reported > 4 MMDs, and 56.2% reported > 4 MHDs. Nearly half of females experienced menstrually-related migraines. Although most patients reported taking medication for migraine, severe disability and medication overuse were observed. PCPs were the main treatment providers, highlighting the need for improved expertise and referrals to specialists. Further research is required for a better understanding of the disparities between migraine frequency and treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.