Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838286›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Emergency department crowding in the Netherlands; evaluation of a real-time ambulance diversion dashboard.

E C M Baan-Kooman, S Mol, M C van der Linden, M I Gaakeer, V A de Ridder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E C M Baan-KoomanFranciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.baan@franciscus.nl.
S MolFranciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M C van der LindenHaaglanden Medisch Centrum, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
M I GaakeerAdrz, 's-Gravenpolderseweg 114, 4462 RA, Goes, The Netherlands.
V A de RidderUMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX 3584, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding is a growing concern worldwide and associated with negative effects. In 2013, 68% of Dutch ED-managers experienced crowding on several days of the week. This resulted into the introduction in phases of an ambulance diversion dashboard, in order to influence ED input. Increasing numbers of Dutch EDs have implemented this dashboard, visualizing regional ambulance diversions by means of a traffic light.

methodsThis is a descriptive study of a nationwide online survey of Dutch EDs, conducted between January and October 2023. It included both qualitative and quantitative questions. The outcomes and analysis are derived from descriptive data of respondents' experience of crowding as well as their usage and perceived effectiveness of the ambulance diversions dashboard.

resultsAt the time of the survey, 62 of 82 Dutch EDs (75.6%) actually used the dashboard, of which 56 EDs responded (90.3% response rate). 69.7% Of ED managers experienced ED crowding more than three times a week. Of the respondents using the dashboard, 52.8% reported it only occasionally alleviates ED inflow. The purported reasons are the limited number of patients affected by the red light (ambulance diversion) and the presence of regional crowding. The effects of the orange light (impending ambulance diversion) on ED input differ greatly among hospitals, mostly due to their own internal agreements. In accordance, many respondents (53.6%) expressed dissatisfaction with the resources available to them to alleviate crowding.

conclusionAfter conducting a national survey, ED crowding is reported as a persisting nationwide problem with its prevalence largely unchanged since the introduction of the ambulance diversion dashboard. Most hospitals reported having insufficient resources to alleviate it. The effects of the ambulance diversion dashboard to decrease crowding are apparently limited because it affects a small portion of total ED presentations and because of the influence of regional crowding. The main function of the orange light is to increase ED throughput and output rather than reducing ED input.

Indexed as

Ambulance diversionsCrowdingEmergency departmentEmergency roomEmergency ServiceHumansThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID39838286
PMCPMC11753112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.