Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838226›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Detect Lamina Dura Loss on Periapical Radiographs.

Büşra Şahin, İlknur Eninanç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Büşra ŞahinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey. bbusrashn@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-5012
İlknur EninançDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-6237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a custom artificial intelligence (AI) model for detecting lamina dura (LD) loss around the roots of anterior and posterior teeth on intraoral periapical radiographs. A total of 701 periapical radiographs of the anterior and posterior regions retrieved from the Dentomaxillofacial Radiology archives were reviewed. Images were cropped to include only the teeth exhibiting LD loss and those without LD loss, which were labeled as "1" and "0," respectively. The dataset was diversified using image preprocessing and data augmentation techniques. Among the radiographs, 72% were used for training, 18% for validation, and 10% for testing. A custom AI model, consisting of 4 blocks and 49 layers, with a total of 21.2 million parameters, was developed using the TensorFlow library and residual blocks introduced in ResNet architecture. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1 score, and kappa (κ) coefficients (for intra-observer agreement) were calculated to evaluate the performance of the AI model. When applied to a test set of 71 images, the AI model showed good performance in detecting LD loss, achieving an average sensitivity of 0.730, specificity of 0.706, accuracy of 0.718, precision of 0.730, and an F1 score of 0.730, regardless of the dental region. This study represents the first known application of an AI algorithm tailored to detect LD loss on periapical radiographs. The developed AI model could aid clinicians in making accurate diagnosis and help prevent misdiagnosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiography, DentalHumansSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceLamina duraPeriapical radiographResNet architecture

Identifiers

PMID39838226
PMCPMC11811344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.