ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient and rapid identification of tropical maize inbred lines tolerant to waterlogging stress.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Root morphogenetic responses to waterlogging stress in plants: from structural reconfiguration to molecular regulatory mechanisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waterlogging (WL) is an important abiotic stress, severely affecting plant growth and development, inhibiting root respiration and degradation of chlorophyll, senescence of leaves and chlorosis leading to substantial yield loss. These intensities of yield losses generally depend on the duration of WL and crop growth stages. Maize being a dry land crop is particularly sensitive to WL. Systematic screening techniques to identify parameters linked with tolerance are not well established which serves as a major bottleneck in the identification of promising genotypes. In this study, 120 maize inbred lines belonging to diverse genetic backgrounds were evaluated for WL tolerance both at pre-emergence as well as the seedling stage. Results based on percentage germination at pre-emergence and percentage survival at the seedling stage under WL established that pre-germination tolerance is independent of seedling stage tolerance. Membership function value based on WL tolerance coefficient of shoot and root fresh weights, dry weights, lengths, root surface area, shoot area and root volume was used to identify tolerant lines. Established mathematical models were used and identified root dry weight as a single reliable parameter to judge the tolerance level of genotypes. The use of BLPSI and ESIM selection indices as well as MTSI to judge the stability as well as genetic worth of genotypes further strengthens the selection efficiency. Lines thus performing best across all the models included I 185, I 172 and SE 503 and were identified as tolerant lines for WL. A combination of these different selection approaches would further strengthen selection efficiency and is believed to be a rapid and effective selection approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.