Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838144›Full record

GuidelineSurgical endoscopy2025

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: patient engagement update to standard operating procedure.

Nisha Narula, Bethany J Slater, Patricia Sylla, Sunjay S Kumar, Elisa Calabrese, Joe Nadglowski, Deborah S Keller

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nisha NarulaDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Medical Science Building, Room G-506, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. nn422@njms.rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5668-1480
Bethany J SlaterDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patricia SyllaDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Sunjay S KumarDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7057-0097
Elisa CalabreseDepartment of Surgery, University of California-East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-0217-7933
Joe NadglowskiObesity Action Coalition, Tampa, FL, USA.
Deborah S KellerDivision of Digestive Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-6206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Guidelines Committee develops evidence-based surgical guidelines. Involvement of patient partners is important to ensure patient concerns and values are adequately addressed and incorporated. This standard operating procedure (SOP) for the process of patient partner involvement within the guidelines is described here.

methodsThis document outlines the SAGES Patient Partners SOP to involve patient partners in a consistent and reproducible manner.

resultsSAGES has now developed a SOP to include patient partners so that patient views are represented in current guidelines.

conclusionGuidelines must be patient centric and in order to do so must include patient partners. The SAGES Guidelines Patient Engagement Update to Standard operating Procedure aims to provide an outline for systematically doing so.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalPatient ParticipationHumansSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesGuidelinePatient engagementPatient partnerPatients in the public interestProtocol

Identifiers

PMID39838144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.