ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Feasibility of an < 24 h discharge pathway with tele-monitoring after elective colectomies: a pilot study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImplementation of enhanced recovery after surgery principles has led to exploration of ambulatory pathways in surgery, including gastrointestinal surgery. However, implementation of ambulatory pathways after colorectal surgery has not been established yet. Previous studies suggest that discharge within 24 h in colorectal surgery is only possible with a clear protocol and careful patient selection.
methodsSingle center prospective feasibility pilot study of thirty patients in one large non-academic teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Patients were included if they were between 18 and 80 years old, underwent elective minimal invasive colonic resection with anastomosis, had a ASA-score of I or II, fully understood the procedure, had a person at home the first 4 days after surgery and lived within 30 min travel radius to the hospital. Exclusion criteria were cT4 tumours, multi-visceral resections, insulin-dependent diabetes, anti-coagulants which required perioperative bridging, and perioperative complications. Patients followed a pathway with discharge within 24 h postoperatively and were monitored by a tele-monitoring smartphone application after discharge.
resultsThirty patients were included and twenty-one patients (70%) fulfilled discharge criteria within 24 h after surgery. Six (20%) patients were readmitted within 30 days. Complications occurred in six (20%) patients, which was classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complication in one (3%) patient. Patients and health care provider satisfaction was high.
conclusionFindings of this study support the feasibility and safety of an early discharge protocol with tele-monitoring after minimal invasive colonic resection. Satisfaction of patients and health care providers was high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39838143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.