ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Long-term survival analysis based on tumor location in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity study on MiRNA expression in islet cells of rat pancreatic head and tail.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed at assessing whether long-term survival outcomes were different based on tumor location in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who underwent pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
methodsFollowing CRT, resection rate was 60.5% (286/473) and the resected patients had pancreatic head (n = 218), body (n = 34) and tail (n = 34) tumors. Survival analyses were conducted, independent predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified, and then survival outcomes were stratified by the predictors of DFS and OS.
resultsResection rates were; 64.7% (head) vs. 46.6% (body) and 54.0% (tail) cases, p = 0.009. Among these cases, pancreatic head patients exhibited a higher incidence of initial clinical stage 3 tumors; 48.2% (head) vs. 29.4% (body) and 0% (tail) cases, p < 0.001 with more unresctable-locally advanced tumors; 22.0% (head) vs. 11.8% (body) and 0% (tail), p < 0.001, but demonstrated a better response to CRT; Evans grades 3/4 in 49.1% (head) vs. 23.5% (body) and 26.5% (tail), p = 0.012. Five-year DFS rates were; 19.9% (head) vs. 11.8% (body) vs. 24.6% (tail), p = 0.565 and OS rates; 25.4% (head) vs. 27.7% (body) vs. 32.0% (tail), p = 0.341. Significant predictors of DFS and OS included post-CRT CA19-9 levels, tumor differentiation, resection margins and pathological portal vein invasion. Based on these predictors, survival outcomes were also comparable. Pathological nodal invasion influenced DFS, while pathological stage impacted OS.
conclusionPancreatic head patients had the best resection rate and long-term survival outcomes were comparable, attributable to the better response to CRT by pancreatic head than the body and tail PDAC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.