Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39838135›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

EGEFACE: A new face memory test with static and dynamic images.

Sonia Amado, Murat C Karataş, Elif Yüvrük, Aycan Kapucu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia AmadoDepartment of Psychology, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2289-336X
Murat C KarataşDepartment of Psychology, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye. murat.karatas@btu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-8543
Elif YüvrükDepartment of Psychology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Muğla, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7150-4060
Aycan KapucuDepartment of Psychology, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-9876

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 219K084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face memory is a crucial cognitive ability necessary for maintaining a healthy social life. Recent studies reveal large individual differences in face recognition ability. Face memory tests are used to evaluate this ability. The main purpose of this study was to develop a new face memory test (EGEFACE) addressing the limitations of existing tests using both static and dynamic stimuli to increase ecological validity; employing face recognition algorithms to adjust test difficulty; measuring face memory accuracy independently of response bias by including both target-absent and target-present trials and using ROC analysis; and developing a test to measure both ends of the face recognition ability spectrum. After building a new database of static and dynamic faces, we created three difficulty levels using a face recognition algorithm. We collected data from 703 participants in two steps and examined the internal consistency, split-half reliability, and item-total score correlations. The reliability analysis confirmed that both target-absent and target-present trials of EGEFACE were reliable. High EGEFACE performers scored near super recognizer levels on CFMT+, while low performers showed limited overlap with prosopagnosic-level performance on CFMT+, suggesting EGEFACE's sensitivity across different levels of face recognition ability. Overall, results indicated a moderate positive correlation between EGEFACE and CFMT+, showing that both tests assess similar cognitive skills, while a low to moderate correlation with KFMT suggests that EGEFACE measures cognitive ability that is related to yet distinct from face perception. The results suggest that EGEFACE shows promise as an ecologically valid and effective alternative tool for assessing individual differences in face memory.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionMemoryNeuropsychological TestsRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsFaceFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultEge face memory testFace memory testIndividual differencesUnfamiliar face recognition

Identifiers

PMID39838135
PMCPMC11750894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.