Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Understanding metro station areas' functional characteristics via embedding representation: A case study of shanghai.

Heping Jiang, Ruihua Liu, Shijia Luo, Disheng Yi, Jing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heping Jiang *Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey (Southwest China Center for Geoscience Innovation), Chengdu, 610218, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-2815
Ruihua Liu *The High School Affiliated to Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, 100024, China.
Shijia LuoBeijing Guangqumen Middle School, Beijing, 100062, China.
Disheng YiCollege of Resources Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Jing ZhangCollege of Resources Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China. zhangjings@mail.cnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2469-0195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As crucial transportation hubs for urban travel, metro stations catalyze the transformation of their surrounding areas into highly prominent locations where many activities converge. Uncovering the functional attributes of station areas holds immense significance in comprehending citizens' activity demands, thereby offering valuable insights for regional development and planning in proximity to metro stations. This study introduces a framework that improves the process of accurately representing station areas. On the basis of the semantic vectors of point of interests (POI) categories trained by the GloVe model, the partition smooth inverse frequency (P-SIF) model and affinity propagation (AP) are employed to generate the embedding representations of station areas and categorize. Finally, we classify the station areas into 9 functional groups: and analyse the spatial distribution characteristics of each group. It is found that most of the station areas in Shanghai show the characteristics of mixed type, in which the characteristics of residential type and commercial type are obvious. In terms of spatial, the stations with commercial characteristics are mainly distributed in the central area of the city, while those with residential and working characteristics are scattered.

Indexed as

Functional characteristicsMetro station areaPOI dataText representation

Identifiers

PMID39837969
PMCPMC11751495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.