Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837957›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Interracial contact shapes racial bias in the learning of person-knowledge.

Margaret Welte, Tzipporah P Dang, Shaina Rosenblum, Jennifer T Kubota, Jasmin Cloutier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margaret WelteDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Tzipporah P DangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Shaina RosenblumDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8330-5959
Jennifer T KubotaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-8490
Jasmin CloutierDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. jasmin.cloutier@gmail.com.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2141326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During impression formation, perceptual cues facilitate social categorization while person-knowledge can promote individuation and enhance person memory. Although there is extensive literature on the cross-race recognition deficit, observed when racial ingroup faces are recognized more than outgroup faces, it is unclear whether a similar deficit exists when recalling individuating information about outgroup members. To better understand how perceived race can bias person memory, the present study examined how self-identified White perceivers' interracial contact impacts learning of perceptual cues and person-knowledge about perceived Black and White others over five sessions of training. While person-knowledge facilitated face recognition accuracy for low-contact perceivers, face recognition accuracy did not differ for high-contact perceivers based on person-knowledge availability. The results indicate a bias towards better recall of ingroup person knowledge, which decreased for high-contact perceivers across the five-day training but simultaneously increased for low-contact perceivers. Overall, the elimination of racial bias in recall of person-knowledge among high-contact perceivers amid a persistent cross-race deficit in face recognition suggests that contact may have a greater impact on the recall of person-knowledge than on face recognition.

Identifiers

PMID39837957
PMCPMC11751151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.