Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837945›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Upstreamness and downstreamness in input-output analysis from local and aggregate information.

Silvia Bartolucci, Fabio Caccioli, Francesco Caravelli, Pierpaolo Vivo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distribution of centrality measures on undirected random networks via the cavity method.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Silvia BartolucciDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, 66-72 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6EA, UK.
Fabio CaccioliDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, 66-72 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6EA, UK.
Francesco CaravelliT-Division (Center for Nonlinear Studies and T4), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Pierpaolo VivoDepartment of Mathematics, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK. pierpaolo.vivo@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

National Nuclear Security Administration DE-AC52-06NA25396UK Research and Innovation MR/X023028/1U.S. Department of Energy LDRD grant 20240245ER
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ranking sectors and countries within global value chains is of paramount importance to estimate risks and forecast growth in large economies. However, this task is often non-trivial due to the lack of complete and accurate information on the flows of money and goods between sectors and countries, which are encoded in input-output (I-O) tables. In this work, we show that an accurate estimation of the role played by sectors and countries in supply chain networks can be achieved without full knowledge of the I-O tables, but only relying on local and aggregate information, e.g., the total intermediate demand per sector. Our method, based on a rank-1 approximation to the I-O table, shows consistently good performance in reconstructing rankings (i.e., upstreamness and downstreamness measures for countries and sectors) when tested on empirical data from the world input-output database. Moreover, we connect the accuracy of our approximate framework with the spectral properties of the I-O tables, which ordinarily exhibit relatively large spectral gaps. Our approach provides a fast and analytically tractable framework to rank constituents of a complex economy without the need of matrix inversions and the knowledge of finer intersectorial details.

Identifiers

PMID39837945
PMCPMC11751120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.