ArticleScientific reports2025
The strength of confidence is involved in controlling the intensity of attentional allocation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subjective confidence and uncertainty are closely related to cognition and behavior. However, direct evidence that subjective confidence controls attention allocation is lacking. This study aimed to clarify whether subjective confidence could be involved in controlling attention allocation and intensity. We created a model for predicting the participants' subjective confidence and verified its validity. Then, an electroencephalogram was recorded while the participants engaged in a behavioral task aimed to allocate their attention based on their confidence level. We observed a negative correlation where trials with higher confidence were associated with shorter reaction times to the target. Regarding event-related potentials (ERPs), we observed higher P1 potentials (early component of the ERP waveform after stimulus onset) in the ipsilateral occipital area during target presentation. Additionally, we observed lower frontoparietal P3a potentials (component of the ERP waveform associated with attention) in the high-confidence condition. We observed a higher alpha (8-12 Hz) power in the ipsilateral occipitoparietal area of the target presentation in the low-confidence condition. Subjective confidence might influence attentional allocation and intensity, possibly achieved by suppressing processing in the target-absent space. Our findings provided important insights into the role of subjective confidence in cognitive and behavioral control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.