Observational studyScientific reports2025
Ultrasound-based abdominal muscles and diaphragm assessment in predicting extubation failure in patients requiring neurointensive care: a single-center observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of bedside ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function in preparing tracheostomised patients for ventilator liberation and decannulation: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Spontaneous breathing trials as predictors of extubation outcomes in neurocritical care: insights from the ENIO study.Intensive care medicine · 2026Observational
- Ultrasound assessment of abdominal respiratory muscles during ventilator weaning: A scoping review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026Review
- Nurse-performed diaphragm ultrasound integrated with spontaneous breathing trial criteria for risk stratification of extubation outcomes in neurosurgical critically ill patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-view ultrasound for diaphragm monitoring and cough strength estimation.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound and diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index combined assessment for successful weaning in neurocritical patients on mechanical ventilation.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extubation failure rates are notably high in patients in neurointensive care. Ineffective cough is the variable independently associated with extubation failure, but its quantification remains challenging. Patients with primary central nervous system injury requiring invasive mechanical ventilation were included. After a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), abdominal muscles and diaphragm ultrasound were performed under tidal breathing and coughing. 98 patients were initially recruited for the study, and 40 patients were ultimately included in the final analysis. Extubation failure occurred in 8 (20%) patients. Rectus abdominis (RA) and internal oblique (IO) muscles showed difference regarding cough thickening fraction (TF) between the extubation success and failure group (P < 0.05). The logistic regression that analysis suggested cough TFRA, cough TFIO and cough TIO were the factors associated with extubation outcome (P < 0.05). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, cough TFIO exhibited the strongest predictive value (AUC = 0.957, 95% CI:0.8979-1). A threshold of cough TFIO ≥ 34.15% predicted extubation success with a sensitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 75%. Abdominal muscles ultrasound was a promising tool to predict extubation for patients requiring neurointensive care.Trial registration: The study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2400088210, Registered 13 August 2024 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=234150 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.