ArticleScientific reports2025
An in silico analysis of heart rate impact on wall shear stress hemodynamic parameters in aortic coarctation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heart rate and left ventricular remodeling after repaired coarctation of the aorta: a cross-sectional study.Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines how heart rate (HR) affects hemodynamics in a South African infant with Coarctation of the Aorta. Computed tomography angiography segments aortic coarctation anatomy; Doppler echocardiography derives inlet flow waveforms. Simulations occur at 100, 120, and 160 beats per minute, representing reduced, resting, and elevated HR levels. Turbulence was analyzed over time and space using turbulence-resolving and pulsatile large-eddy simulations. Specifically, a 60% reduction in HR led to a reduction in maximum velocity by 45%, and a 57% decrease in pressure drop. The reduction in turbulence-related metrics was less significant. The ratio of turbulent kinetic energy to total kinetic energy decreased by 2%, while turbulent wall shear stress decreased by 3%. These results demonstrate that HR significantly affects velocity and pressure drop, while turbulence arising from the coarctation region is relatively unaffected. The balance between turbulent kinetic energy and total kinetic energy shows minimal enhancement due to the complex interplay among HR, turbulence, and geometry. This complexity prompts discussion on how HR-slowing medications, such as beta-blockers or ivabradine, could positively influence hemodynamic stresses. In particular, the results indicate that while HR modulation can influence flow dynamics, it may not significantly reduce turbulence-induced shear stresses within the coarctation zone. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to understand the potential impact of HR modulation in the management of CoA, and whether interventions targeting the anatomical correction of the coarctation may be more effective in improving hemodynamic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.