Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837883›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Minimal sourced and lightweight federated transfer learning models for skin cancer detection.

Vikas Khullar, Prabhjot Kaur, Shubham Gargrish, Anand Muni Mishra, Prabhishek Singh, Manoj Diwakar, Anchit Bijalwan, Indrajeet Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vikas KhullarChitkara University Institute of Engineering Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Prabhjot KaurChitkara University Institute of Engineering Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Shubham GargrishChitkara University Institute of Engineering Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Anand Muni MishraChandigarh Engineering College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri, Mohali, India.
Prabhishek SinghSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manoj DiwakarCSE Department, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttrakhand, India.
Anchit BijalwanFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. anchit.bijalwan@amu.edu.et.
Indrajeet GuptaSchool of Computer Science and AI, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most fatal diseases that affect people is skin cancer. Because nevus and melanoma lesions are so similar and there is a high likelihood of false negative diagnoses challenges in hospitals. The aim of this paper is to propose and develop a technique to classify type of skin cancer with high accuracy using minimal resources and lightweight federated transfer learning models. Here minimal resource based pre-trained deep learning models including EfficientNetV2S, EfficientNetB3, ResNet50, and NasNetMobile have been used to apply transfer learning on data of shape[Formula: see text]. To compare with applied minimal resource transfer learning, same methodology has been applied using best identified model i.e. EfficientNetV2S for images of shape[Formula: see text]. The identified minimal and lightweight resource based EfficientNetV2S with images of shape [Formula: see text] have been applied for federated learning ecosystem. Both, identically and non-identically distributed datasets of shape [Formula: see text] have been applied and analyzed through federated learning implementations. The results have been analyzed to show the impact of low-pixel images with non-identical distributions over clients using parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall and categorical losses. The classification of skin cancer shows an accuracy of IID 89.83% and Non-IID 90.64%.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansConvolutional neural networkDiseaseEfficientNetFederated learningLesionsResNetSkin cancerTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39837883
PMCPMC11750969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.