Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837664›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Reduced Neural Responses to Natural Foreground versus Background Sounds in the Auditory Cortex.

Gregory R Hamersky, Luke A Shaheen, Mateo López Espejo, Jereme C Wingert, Stephen V David

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Noise schemas aid hearing in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory R HamerskyNeurosicence Graduate Program, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.ORCID 0000-0002-0612-216X
Luke A ShaheenOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
Mateo López EspejoNeurosicence Graduate Program, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
Jereme C WingertOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
Stephen V DavidOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239 davids@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-3104

Funding

Top-down control of auditory processing in the cortico-collicular network (Administrative Supplement)R01DC014950 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID, STEPHEN V · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
Tools for modeling state-dependent sensory encoding by neural populations across spatial and temporal scalesR01EB028155 · NIBIB · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID, STEPHEN V, MESGARANI, NIMA · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028155NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In everyday hearing, listeners face the challenge of understanding behaviorally relevant foreground stimuli (speech, vocalizations) in complex backgrounds (environmental, mechanical noise). Prior studies have shown that high-order areas of human auditory cortex (AC) preattentively form an enhanced representation of foreground stimuli in the presence of background noise. This enhancement requires identifying and grouping the features that comprise the background so they can be removed from the foreground representation. To study the cortical computations supporting this process, we recorded single-unit activity in AC of male and female ferrets during the presentation of concurrent natural sounds from these two categories. In contrast to expectations from studies in high-order AC, single-unit responses to foreground sounds were strongly reduced relative to the paired background in primary and secondary AC. The degree of reduction could not be explained by a neuron's preference for the foreground or background stimulus in isolation but could be partially explained by spectrotemporal statistics that distinguish foreground and background categories. Responses to synthesized sounds with statistics either matched or randomized relative to natural sounds showed progressively decreased reduction of foreground responses as natural sound statistics were removed. These results challenge the expectation that cortical foreground representations emerge directly from a mixed representation in the auditory periphery. Instead, they suggest the early AC maintains a robust representation of background noise. Strong background representations may produce a distributed code, facilitating selection of foreground signals from a relatively small subpopulation of AC neurons at later processing stages.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PerceptionNeuronsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsFemaleFerretsMaleSoundauditory cortexauditory streamingferretnatural soundsperceptual groupingsingle-unit electrophysiology

Identifiers

PMID39837664
PMCPMC11884389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.