ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Reduced Neural Responses to Natural Foreground versus Background Sounds in the Auditory Cortex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise statistics drive background- and channel-specific interference in auditory midbrain representations of speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Noise schemas aid hearing in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In everyday hearing, listeners face the challenge of understanding behaviorally relevant foreground stimuli (speech, vocalizations) in complex backgrounds (environmental, mechanical noise). Prior studies have shown that high-order areas of human auditory cortex (AC) preattentively form an enhanced representation of foreground stimuli in the presence of background noise. This enhancement requires identifying and grouping the features that comprise the background so they can be removed from the foreground representation. To study the cortical computations supporting this process, we recorded single-unit activity in AC of male and female ferrets during the presentation of concurrent natural sounds from these two categories. In contrast to expectations from studies in high-order AC, single-unit responses to foreground sounds were strongly reduced relative to the paired background in primary and secondary AC. The degree of reduction could not be explained by a neuron's preference for the foreground or background stimulus in isolation but could be partially explained by spectrotemporal statistics that distinguish foreground and background categories. Responses to synthesized sounds with statistics either matched or randomized relative to natural sounds showed progressively decreased reduction of foreground responses as natural sound statistics were removed. These results challenge the expectation that cortical foreground representations emerge directly from a mixed representation in the auditory periphery. Instead, they suggest the early AC maintains a robust representation of background noise. Strong background representations may produce a distributed code, facilitating selection of foreground signals from a relatively small subpopulation of AC neurons at later processing stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.