ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2026
Symptom and problem burden, performance status and palliative care phases in specialist palliative care: cross-sectional analysis of care episodes.
Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPalliative care phases (stable, unstable, deteriorating, terminal and bereavement) are useful in describing the palliative care situation of patients/relatives and their care needs as well as the suitability of care plans. Little is known about care setting-specific differences of the phases and their association with burden of symptoms/problems and functional status. We aimed to describe the presence and association of symptom/problem burden and functional status with the palliative care phase at the beginning of care episodes in specialist palliative care units, specialist home care teams and advisory services.
methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of a prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre study collecting data on patients' complexity in Germany. Analyses using the palliative care phase, symptom/problem burden measured by the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), functional status measured by the Australian-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS), severity of confusion and agitation, age and gender were conducted, including descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests and multinomial logistic regression.
results3115 phases from three settings were included, with an average age of 72 years (SD±13.3) and 49% male. The distribution of phases at episode start varied among settings: data showed in palliative care units 20.3% stable, 43.4% unstable, 31.5% deteriorating and 4.8% terminal; in palliative care advisory, 26% stable, 33.9% unstable, 32.8% deteriorating and 7.3% terminal; and in specialist palliative home care, 42.4% stable, 21.3% unstable, 29.1% deteriorating and 7.2% terminal phases. Multinomial logistic regression showed that besides functional status, in palliative care units and specialist palliative home care, high physical symptom burden and palliative care advisory, high emotional burden increased the odds of being in an unstable phase.
conclusionsSetting-specific differences in patient characteristics and symptom and problem burden associated with palliative care phases lead towards different demands on the teams providing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.