ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2025
Assessment of blended learning palliative care educational programme in cancer treatment centres in India.
Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards quality indicators in palliative care education: An umbrella review.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe study evaluates the fifth cohort of the palliative care cancer treatment centres (CTC) educational programme in India with the aim of refining the course on the basis of participant feedback thereby improving palliative care services at cancer centres.
methodsThe intervention included participation in the CTC 5 teaching and training programme, which encompassed foundation course, refresher course, access to palliative care training modules, clinical training and mentorship under palliative care experts. The feedback was taken from all 57 participants (29 doctors and 28 nurses) of CTC 5 programme representing 14 hospitals across nine regions in India. The assessment tools included Likert scale ratings and free-text comments. 3-point and 5-point Likert scale ratings were used to gauge the usefulness of course topics, quality of content and delivery. A mixed methods approach was used for a comprehensive evaluation by taking both quantitative measures of participant inputs and qualitative insights into their experiences and suggestions. The knowledge gained by the participants was analysed using pre-training and post-training assessments.
resultsThe feedback obtained from the participants highlighted both strengths and scope for improvement. The foundation course received positive feedback for its sessions, especially on communication skills and pain management. The refresher course received positive feedback for team presentations but lacked sufficient case discussions. The interactive nature of sessions was well-received. Following the CTC 5 programme, participants showed a 30.38% knowledge gain. Overall, the programme exceeded expectations for 62% of participants, highlighting its impact on personal development and clinical practices in palliative care.
conclusionThe study provides useful insights for designing future palliative care educational courses to address the needs of health professionals. The CTC programme has promising potential to bring about positive changes in both the personal and professional development of participants ultimately improving palliative care services across India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.