ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Deep learning-based anterior segment identification and parameter assessment of primary angle closure disease in ultrasound biomicroscopy images.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive utility and associated challenges of adolescent arm scarring in suicide risk assessment.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Practical Applications, Subspecialty Evidence and Real-World Deployment.Cureus · 2025Review
- Imaging biomarkers in ophthalmology: hype, hope or game-changer?BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop an artificial intelligence algorithm to automatically identify the anterior segment structures and assess multiple parameters of primary angle closure disease (PACD) in ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images.
designDevelopment and validation of an artificial intelligence algorithm for UBM images.
methods2339 UBM images from 592 subjects were collected for algorithm development. A multitissue segmentation model based on deep learning was developed for automatic identification of anterior segments and localisation of scleral spur. Then, measurement of the typical angle parameters was performed from the predicted results, including angle-opening distance at 500 µm (AOD 500), trabecular-ciliary angle (TCA) and iris area. We then collected 222 UBM images from 45 subjects in two centres for model validation.
resultsThe multitissue identification model established in this study reached mean Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.98, 0.98 and 0.98 on cornea segmentation, iris segmentation and ciliary body segmentation and a mean error distance of 1.07 pixels on scleral spur localisation. Our model got a mean IoU of 0.98, 0.98 and 0.99 on cornea segmentation, iris segmentation and ciliary body segmentation and a mean error distance of 0.49 pixels on scleral spur localisation in open-angle images and received 0.98, 0.98, 0.978 and 1.42 pixels respectively in angle-closure images. The mean differences between automatic and manual measurement of the angle parameters were 3.07 μm of AOD, 3.34 degrees of TCA and 0.05 mm
conclusionsThe automatic method of multitissue identification for PACD eyes developed was feasible, and the automatic measurement of angle parameters was reliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.