Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837536›Full record

ReviewAustralian veterinary journal2025

Australian guidelines for equine internal parasite management.

A Beasley, G Abbas, K Hughes, C El-Hage, C Jacobson, J Bauquier, E Wilkes, P Carrigan, L Cudmore, J Hurley and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

A BeasleySchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
G AbbasMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.
K HughesSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
C El-HageMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.
C JacobsonCentre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
J BauquierMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.
E WilkesRacing Victoria, Flemington, Victoria, Australia.
P CarriganScone Equine Hospital, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
L CudmoreScone Equine Hospital, Scone, New South Wales, Australia.
J HurleySwettenham Stud, Nagambie, Victoria, Australia.
I BeveridgeMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.
M NielsenM.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
A JabbarMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-0046

Funding

AgriFutures Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the emergence of resistance amongst intestinal parasites of horses to all available anthelmintic classes has emphasised the need for a paradigm shift in parasite control approaches within the Australian equine industry. Findings of a recent Australia-wide research project have provided new insights into intestinal parasites (i.e. strongyles and ascarids) and parasite control from the perspectives of Australian horse breeders and equine veterinarians. The published data have revealed recent trends in parasite prevalence and distribution, breeders' and veterinarians' attitudes and perspectives on controlling horse internal parasites, the efficacy of commonly used anthelmintic products and post-treatment egg reappearance periods. These studies have formed the basis of newly developed guidelines managing and treating gastrointestinal nematodes in horses. Tailored for equine veterinarians, these guidelines contain information on target parasites and risk factors for their transmission, as well as practical advice for surveillance, anthelmintic choice, timing of treatment, testing for anthelmintic resistance and managing refugia. The Australian Guidelines for Equine Internal Parasite Management (AGEIPM) will serve as a pocket companion for equine veterinarians, providing best-practice recommendations grounded in locally conducted scientific research. Dissemination and extension of the AGEIPM to industry will strengthen the client-practitioner relationship. The aim is to reduce reliance on blanket deworming in equine parasite management programs and help curb the progression of resistance to the limited anthelmintic classes available for treating horses.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsHorse DiseasesParasitic Diseases, AnimalAnimalsAustraliaDrug ResistanceHelminthiasis, AnimalHorsesPractice Guidelines as TopicAnthelminticsanthelminticanthelmintic resistanceequineguidelinesmanagementparasites

Identifiers

PMID39837536
PMCPMC11962583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.