Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837519›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

More than a token photo: humanizing scientists enhances student engagement.

Robin A Costello, Emily P Driessen, Melissa K Kjelvik, Elizabeth H Schultheis, Rachel M Youngblood, Ash T Zemenick, Marjorie G Weber, Cissy J Ballen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DataVersify: A Framework for Data Literacy Instruction Featuring Scientist Stories.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robin A CostelloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4528-2550
Emily P DriessenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Melissa K KjelvikDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Elizabeth H SchultheisKellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA.
Rachel M YoungbloodDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Ash T ZemenickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
Marjorie G WeberDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
Cissy J BallenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4693-6117

Funding

Division of Undergraduate Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite broad consensus that highlighting counter-stereotypical scientist role models in educational materials promotes equity and success, the specific elements that make these materials effective remain untested. Are pictures of counter-stereotypical scientists enough to communicate to students that scientists come from a variety of backgrounds, or is additional information required? To parse the effects of including visual depictions and humanizing information about scientists featured in biology course materials, we distributed three randomized versions of assignments over several academic terms across 36 undergraduate institutions (

Indexed as

BiologyHumanismScienceStudentsFemaleHumansMalePhotographyYoung Adultbiology undergraduate educationcounter-stereotypical scientistequityrelatabilityscientist role model

Identifiers

PMID39837519
PMCPMC11750396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.