Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837509›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Covert variations of a musician's loudness during collective improvisation capture other musicians' attention and impact their interactions.

Armand Schwarz, Arthur Faraco, Coralie Vincent, Patrick Susini, Emmanuel Ponsot, Clément Canonne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Auditory scene analysis in music: A synthetic review.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armand SchwarzSTMS UMR 9912 (CNRS/IRCAM/Sorbonne Université), Paris, France.
Arthur FaracoUniversidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Coralie VincentSTMS UMR 9912 (CNRS/IRCAM/Sorbonne Université), Paris, France.
Patrick SusiniSTMS UMR 9912 (CNRS/IRCAM/Sorbonne Université), Paris, France.
Emmanuel PonsotSTMS UMR 9912 (CNRS/IRCAM/Sorbonne Université), Paris, France.
Clément CanonneSTMS UMR 9912 (CNRS/IRCAM/Sorbonne Université), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-6971

Funding

Collegium Musicae
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While research on auditory attention in complex acoustical environment is a thriving field, experimental studies thus far have typically treated participants as passive listeners. The present study-which combined real-time covert loudness manipulations and online probe detection-investigates for the first time to our knowledge, the effects of acoustic salience on auditory attention during live interactions, using musical improvisation as an experimental paradigm. We found that musicians were more likely to pay attention to a given co-performer when this performer was made sounding louder or softer; that such salient effect was not owing to the local variations introduced by our manipulations but rather likely to be driven by the more long-term context; and that improvisers tended to be more strongly and more stably coupled when a musician was made more salient. Our results thus demonstrate that a meaningful change of the acoustical context not only captured attention but also impacted the ongoing musical interaction itself, highlighting the tight relationship between attentional selection and interaction in such social scenarios and opening novel perspectives to address whether similar processes are at play in human linguistic interactions.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionLoudness PerceptionMusicAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultattentionimprovisationinteractionsaliencesocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID39837509
PMCPMC11750383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.