Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837489›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2025

A consensus on the definition of positive animal welfare.

Jean-Loup Rault, Melissa Bateson, Alain Boissy, Björn Forkman, Bjørn Grinde, Lorenz Gygax, Jes Lynning Harfeld, Sara Hintze, Linda J Keeling, Lubor Kostal and 10 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dogs' Behavioural Responses to Dog-Assisted Interventions: A Field Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Impact of Pet Videos on Emotional Face Processing.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jean-Loup RaultInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-8318
Melissa BatesonBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alain BoissyHerbivores, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Björn ForkmanDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Bjørn GrindeUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lorenz GygaxAnimal Husbandry & Ethology, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jes Lynning HarfeldDepartment of Culture and Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sara HintzeDepartment of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.
Linda J KeelingDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lubor KostalCentre of Biosciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Alistair B LawrenceScotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.
Michael T MendlAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-1871
Mara MieleSchool of Geography and Planning, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Ruth C NewberryDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Peter SandøeDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences and Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marek ŠpinkaDepartment of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Alex H TaylorICREA, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3492-7667
Laura E WebbAnimal Production Systems group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Laura WhalinThe Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway.
Margit Bak JensenDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of animal welfare is evolving due to progress in our scientific understanding of animal biology and changing societal expectations. Animal welfare science has been primarily concerned with minimizing suffering, but there is growing interest in also promoting positive experiences, grouped under the term positive animal welfare (PAW). However, there are discrepancies in the use of the term PAW. An interdisciplinary group arrived at a consensus that 'PAW can be defined as the animal flourishing through the experience of predominantly positive mental states and the development of competence and resilience. PAW goes beyond ensuring good physical health and the prevention and alleviation of suffering. It encompasses animals experiencing positive mental states resulting from rewarding experiences, including having choices and opportunities to actively pursue goals and achieve desired outcomes'. The definition also considers individual and species-specific differences. It provides a framework for researchers to investigate PAW and thereby generate innovative, informative and reproducible science. Studies of PAW can contribute to a richer picture of an animal's life and may elucidate the biological foundations of happiness. The definition creates opportunities to inspire scientific progress in animal biology and to align animal care practices, legislation and markets with societal expectations.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAnimalsanimal emotionflourishinggood lifegood welfarehappinesspleasure

Identifiers

PMID39837489
PMCPMC11883819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.