Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39837349›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP

A Mixed Method Evaluation of Practitioners' Perspectives on Implementation Strategies for Healthy Eating and Active Living Policy, Systems, and Environmental Changes.

Bailey Houghtaling, Nila Pradhananga, Denise Holston, Melissa Cater, Laura Balis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bailey HoughtalingAuthor Affiliations: School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Dr Houghtaling, Ms Pradhananga, and Dr Holston); Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia (Dr Houghtaling); Center for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska (Drs Houghtaling and Balis); and Agricultural and Extension Education and Evaluation, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Dr Cater).
Nila Pradhananga
Denise Holston
Melissa Cater
Laura Balis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe National Cooperative Extension System is a leader in delivering healthy eating and active living (HEAL) policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) changes; however, these interventions are challenging, and technical assistance efforts often misalign with implementation science concepts.

objectiveThe study objective was to understand the importance of implementation strategies and tailoring needs to support Louisiana Nutrition and Community Health (NCH) practitioners' delivery of rural HEAL PSE changes.

designAn explanatory sequential mixed method study design was used, including a survey to rank the importance of implementation strategies for HEAL PSE changes and a follow-up interview. A review of available implementation strategies (practice activities/resources) for Louisiana HEAL PSE changes was also conducted.

settingThis study occurred within Louisiana and focused on NCH practitioners' ongoing HEAL PSE change efforts throughout the state, with emphasis on rural community settings.

participantsAll NCH practitioners were eligible to participate. "Practitioners" included Extension NCH administrators and agents/educators directly delivering HEAL PSE changes. MAIN OUTCOMES: The main quantitative outcome was the ranked importance of implementation strategies to support NCH practitioners' delivery of HEAL PSE changes. For explanatory interviews, perceptions of higher and lower ranked implementation strategies and tailoring opportunities were of interest. The alignment of available activities/resources with possible implementation strategies was also assessed.

resultsHighly ranked implementation strategies focused on engaging dedicated community partners and community members and starting small to ensure success, generate buy-in, and demonstrate feasibility. Opportunities for capacity building in these areas were identified. A lower ranked implementation strategy, changing organizational structures, was considered less likely to occur but possibly necessary to improve job satisfaction, retention, and return on investment. Available activities/resources overlapped with a few available implementation strategies.

conclusionsThis study identified opportunities to use implementation science concepts to improve program support for NCH practitioners delivering complex HEAL PSE changes.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyHealth PromotionPerceptionHumansImplementation ScienceLouisianaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39837349
PMCPMC12316153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.