ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2025
A generalizable normative deep autoencoder for brain morphological anomaly detection: application to the multi-site StratiBip dataset on bipolar disorder in an external validation framework.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From early to contemporary normative modeling: Mapping individual differences in neurophysiological signals.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders makes researching disorder-specific neurobiological markers an ill-posed problem. Here, we face the need for disease stratification models by presenting a generalizable multivariate normative modelling framework for characterizing brain morphology, applied to bipolar disorder (BD). We used deep autoencoders in an anomaly detection framework, combined for the first time with a confounder removal step that integrates training and external validation. The model was trained with healthy control (HC) data from the human connectome project and applied to multi-site external data of HC and BD individuals. We found that brain deviating scores were greater, more heterogeneous, and with increased extreme values in the BD group, with volumes prominently from the basal ganglia, hippocampus, and adjacent regions emerging as significantly deviating. Similarly, individual brain deviating maps based on modified z scores expressed higher abnormalities occurrences, but their overall spatial overlap was lower compared to HCs. Our generalizable framework enabled the identification of brain deviating patterns differing between the subject and the group levels, a step forward towards the development of more effective and personalized clinical decision support systems and patient stratification in psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.