Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836954›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

What's Going On With Me and How Can I Better Manage My Health? The Potential of GPT-4 to Transform Discharge Letters Into Patient-Centered Letters to Enhance Patient Safety: Prospective, Exploratory Study.

Felix Eisinger, Friederike Holderried, Moritz Mahling, Christian Stegemann-Philipps, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Eric Nazarenus, Alessandra Sonanini, Martina Guthoff, Carsten Eickhoff, Martin Holderried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felix EisingerDepartment of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8902-532X
Friederike HolderriedTübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-0920
Moritz MahlingDepartment of Medical Strategy, Process and Quality Management, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7960-4015
Christian Stegemann-PhilippsTübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8122-5724
Anne Herrmann-WernerTübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2413-7047
Eric NazarenusTübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8635-3891
Alessandra SonaniniTübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4893-3989
Martina GuthoffDepartment of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-980X
Carsten EickhoffInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-4061
Martin HolderriedDepartment of Medical Strategy, Process and Quality Management, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-0516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor hospitalized patients, the discharge letter serves as a crucial source of medical information, outlining important discharge instructions and health management tasks. However, these letters are often written in professional jargon, making them difficult for patients with limited medical knowledge to understand. Large language models, such as GPT, have the potential to transform these discharge summaries into patient-friendly letters, improving accessibility and understanding.

objectiveThis study aims to use GPT-4 to convert discharge letters into more readable patient-centered letters. We evaluated how effectively and comprehensively GPT-4 identified and transferred patient safety-relevant information from the discharge letters to the transformed patient letters.

methodsThree discharge letters were created based on common medical conditions, containing 72 patient safety-relevant pieces of information, referred to as "learning objectives." GPT-4 was prompted to transform these discharge letters into patient-centered letters. The resulting patient letters were analyzed for medical accuracy, patient centricity, and the ability to identify and translate the learning objectives. Bloom's taxonomy was applied to analyze and categorize the learning objectives.

resultsGPT-4 addressed the majority (56/72, 78%) of the learning objectives from the discharge letters. However, 11 of the 72 (15%) learning objectives were not included in the majority of the patient-centered letters. A qualitative analysis based on Bloom's taxonomy revealed that learning objectives in the "Understand" category (9/11) were more frequently omitted than those in the "Remember" category (2/11). Most of the missing learning objectives were related to the content field of "prevention of complications." By contrast, learning objectives regarding "lifestyle" and "organizational" aspects were addressed more frequently. Medical errors were found in a small proportion of sentences (31/787, 3.9%). In terms of patient centricity, the patient-centered letters demonstrated better readability than the discharge letters. Compared with discharge letters, they included fewer medical terms (132/860, 15.3%, vs 165/273, 60/4%), fewer abbreviations (43/860, 5%, vs 49/273, 17.9%), and more explanations of medical terms (121/131, 92.4%, vs 0/165, 0%).

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that GPT-4 has the potential to transform discharge letters into more patient-centered communication. While the readability and patient centricity of the transformed letters are well-established, they do not fully address all patient safety-relevant information, resulting in the omission of key aspects. Further optimization of prompt engineering may help address this issue and improve the completeness of the transformation.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient DischargePatient SafetyHumansProspective Studiesartificial intelligenceGPT-4health care communicationpatient educationpatient letterspatient safety

Identifiers

PMID39836954
PMCPMC11795158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.