Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836866›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2025

Clinical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0 Testing Using First-Catch, Non-Digital Rectal Examination Urine.

Jeffrey J Tosoian, Yuping Zhang, Jacob I Meyers, Spencer Heaton, Javed Siddiqui, Lanbo Xiao, Keavash D Assani, Daniel A Barocas, Ashley E Ross, Zoey Chopra and 9 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reply by Authors.The Journal of urology · 2025
    Article
  11. Analytical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jeffrey J TosoianDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-7614-9931
Yuping ZhangDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jacob I MeyersLynx Dx, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Spencer HeatonLynx Dx, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Javed SiddiquiDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lanbo XiaoDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Keavash D AssaniDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Daniel A BarocasDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ashley E RossDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Zoey ChopraDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Grace C HerronDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jacob A EdelsonDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nathan J GrahamDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Udit SinghalDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Simpa S SalamiDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Todd M MorganDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ganesh S PalapattuDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
John T WeiDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Arul M ChinnaiyanVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007863 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN L. · 1985 to 2024
$38.3M
Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ganesh S Palapattu · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
TRAINING IN THE DEMOGRAPHY OF AGINGT32AG000221 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 1992 to 2026
$15.3M
Exploring Precision Oncology: From Gene Fusions to lncRNAsR35CA231996 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M · 2018 to 2024
$6.4M
Michigan-VUMC Biomarker Characterization CenterU2CCA271854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ARUL M CHINNAIYAN, Jeffrey John Tosoian · 2022 to 2026
$5.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NCI NIH HHS R35 CA231996NCI NIH HHS U2C CA271854NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000221NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 18-gene MyProstateScore 2.0 (MPS2) test was previously validated for detection of grade group (GG) ≥ 2 prostate cancer using post-digital rectal examination (DRE) urine. To improve ease of testing, we validated MPS2 using first-catch, non-DRE urine. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients provided first-catch urine before biopsy. MPS2 values were calculated using previously validated models differing only by extent of clinical data included biomarkers alone (BA; no clinical data), biomarkers and clinical factors (BA + CF), and biomarkers, clinical factors, and prostate volume (BA + CF + PV). The primary outcome was GG ≥ 2 cancer on biopsy. MPS2 performance and clinical consequences of testing were compared with PSA and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator (PCPTrc).

resultsThe cohort included 266 men with median PSA 6.6 ng/mL (IQR, 4.9-9.1) of whom 103 (39%) had GG ≥ 2 cancer on biopsy. The AUC for GG ≥ 2 cancer was 57% for PSA, 62% for PCPTrc, and 71%, 74%, and 77% for MPS2 models. Under a testing approach detecting > 90% of GG ≥ 2 cancers, MPS2 testing would have avoided 36% to 42% of unnecessary biopsies, as compared with 13% using the PCPTrc. In patients with a prior negative biopsy, MPS2 testing would have avoided 44% to 53% of repeat biopsies, as compared with only 2.6% using PCPTrc.

conclusionsUsing first-catch urine, MPS2 meaningfully improved the proportion of biopsies avoided relative to PCPTrc while maintaining highly sensitive detection of GG ≥ 2 cancer. Non-DRE testing provides a convenient, objective, and highly accurate testing option to reduce the need for imaging and biopsy in men with elevated PSA.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyDigital Rectal ExaminationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstateProstate-Specific AntigenBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigenbiomarkersearly detection of cancerliquid biopsyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39836866
PMCPMC11981841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.