ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Trajectory inference from single-cell genomics data with a process time model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation models in omics research: a comprehensive survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- From noise to models to numbers: Evaluating negative binomial models and parameter estimations in single-cell RNA-seq.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Comment On: "Integrating Single-Cell and Microarray Data to Explore the Role of Autophagy-Related Gene Atg7 in Osteoporosis" [Letter].Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- A novel paradigm for single-cell annotation in stem cell research.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- Multimodal single cell analyses reveal gene networks of planarian stem cell differentiation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Biophysical constraints on mRNA decay rates shape macroevolutionary divergence in steady-state abundances.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Sequencing: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- scRL: Utilizing Reinforcement Learning to Evaluate Fate Decisions in Single-Cell Data.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics experiments provide gene expression snapshots of heterogeneous cell populations across cell states. These snapshots have been used to infer trajectories and dynamic information even without intensive, time-series data by ordering cells according to gene expression similarity. However, while single-cell snapshots sometimes offer valuable insights into dynamic processes, current methods for ordering cells are limited by descriptive notions of "pseudotime" that lack intrinsic physical meaning. Instead of pseudotime, we propose inference of "process time" via a principled modeling approach to formulating trajectories and inferring latent variables corresponding to timing of cells subject to a biophysical process. Our implementation of this approach, called Chronocell, provides a biophysical formulation of trajectories built on cell state transitions. The Chronocell model is identifiable, making parameter inference meaningful. Furthermore, Chronocell can interpolate between trajectory inference, when cell states lie on a continuum, and clustering, when cells cluster into discrete states. By using a variety of datasets ranging from cluster-like to continuous, we show that Chronocell enables us to assess the suitability of datasets and reveals distinct cellular distributions along process time that are consistent with biological process times. We also compare our parameter estimates of degradation rates to those derived from metabolic labeling datasets, thereby showcasing the biophysical utility of Chronocell. Nevertheless, based on performance characterization on simulations, we find that process time inference can be challenging, highlighting the importance of dataset quality and careful model assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.