ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
The Genetics of Female and Male Infertility.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tiao-Jing-Cu-Yun Acupuncture combined with estradiol in the treatment of patients with thin endometrium undergoing hormone replacement therapy for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- A Nanos3-containing protein complex can activate RNA translation in primordial germ cells in vivo.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Human YTHDC2 mutations disturb RNA homeostasis of oocytes and early embryos.Human genetics · 2026Article
- The role of BMI1 in assessing endometrial receptivity and its clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic, Epigenetic, and Non-Genetic Factors in Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Genes · 2025Review
- The Evolution of In Vitro Fertilization Practices in Saudi Arabia: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn estimated 17% of all couples worldwide are involuntarily childless (infertile). The clinically identifiable causes of infertility can be found in the male or female partner or in both. The molecular pathophysiology of infertility still remains unclear in many cases but is increasingly being revealed by genetic analyses.
methodsThis review article is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search.
resultsThe clinical diagnostic evaluation of an infertile couple may yield an indication for genetic analysis. Women with premature ovarian insufficiency should undergo chromosomal analysis and study of the FMR1 gene. If congenital adrenal hyperplasia is suspected, the CYP21A2 gene should be investigated. In men, genetic diagnosis is based primarily on the findings of semen analysis. Klinefelter syndrome and deletions of the Y-chromosomal azoospermia factors may severely limit sperm production. In both male and female partners, the analysis of a gene panel selected on the basis of the individual indication may identify the cause of infertility, e.g., hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, premature ovarian insufficiency, or severe disturbances of spermatogenesis. In some cases, genetic analysis can help determine the likelihood of success of sperm retrieval via testicular biopsy in men, and the potential indication for oocyte cryopreservation in women.
conclusionGenetic causes, disease patterns, and the related investigations are becoming increasingly important in the diagnostic evaluation of infertile couples and have implications for further treatment, for the children of the affected couple, and for other family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.