Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836408›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab with Weekly Anetumab Ravtansine or Weekly Paclitaxel in Platinum-Resistant/Refractory High-Grade Ovarian Cancer (NCI Trial).

Husam A Alqaisi, David E Cohn, Jing-Yi Chern, Linda R Duska, Andrea Jewell, Bradley R Corr, Ira Seth Winer, Eugenia Girda, Marta A Crispens, Neesha C Dhani and 19 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Gynecologic Oncology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Husam A AlqaisiDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0007-6190-9671
David E CohnThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-6172
Jing-Yi ChernMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0009-0001-3851-2664
Linda R DuskaUniversity of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-4123
Andrea JewellThe Women's Cancer Center, University of Kansas Medical Hospital, Overland Park, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-6662
Bradley R CorrUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-2585
Ira Seth WinerKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-8296
Eugenia GirdaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-5475
Marta A CrispensVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-0011
Neesha C DhaniDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0410-6932
Ainhoa MadariagaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-9762
Robert C GrantDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9821-0377
Matthew MalagutiDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-3312-7546
Crystal LeeDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-1559-8056
Valerie BoweringDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0910-5186
Horace WongDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4453-5865
Andrew PoothullilDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-9954-5877
Vanessa SpeersDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-7047-3988
Lisa WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9726-0383
Philippe L BedardDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6771-2999
John C BradyDepartment of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0004-7982-1211
Andrew B NixonDepartment of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-2964
Li ChenUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0003-2608-5508
Claire O'ConnorUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0006-9404-9228
William ZamboniUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-8319-4482
Tawyna McKeeInvestigational Drug Branch (IDB), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), National Cancer Institute (NCI).ORCID 0009-0003-3219-5914
Jeffrey A MoscowInvestigational Drug Branch (IDB), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), National Cancer Institute (NCI).ORCID 0000-0002-0479-1693
Amit M OzaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9510-8641
Stephanie LheureuxDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4405-5890

Funding

The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
Princess Margaret Phase I Consorium (PMP1C)UM1CA186644 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI Philippe Bedard, Kevin D Courtney · 2014 to 2026
$16.6M
Duke-UNC-Wash U Partnership for Early Phase Clinical Trials in CancerUM1CA186704 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABBRUZZESE, JAMES L., DEES, ELIZABETH CLAIRE · 2014 to 2019
$6.8M
National Cancer Institute (NCI) CA186644NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186644NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMesothelin (MSLN) is highly expressed in high-grade serous/endometrioid ovarian cancers (HGOC). Anetumab ravtansine (AR) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed at the MSLN antigen with a tubulin polymerization inhibitor. We assessed the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of the combination AR/bevacizumab (Bev; ARB) versus weekly paclitaxel/Bev (PB) in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory HGOC (prrHGOC). PATIENTS AND

methodsFollowing a run-in phase I study to assess ARB safety, patients with prrHGOC with centrally confirmed MSLN-positive expression were randomized to ARB or PB (weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with Bev 10 mg/kg biweekly). Patients were stratified by platinum resistance/refractory and prior Bev. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall response rate, safety, and blood-based angiome biomarker assessment. A futility analysis was planned after 35 PFS events.

resultsThe combination of Bev (10 mg/kg) biweekly with AR (2.2 mg/kg) weekly was well tolerated. About phase II results, MSLN positivity was 88%, and 57 patients were randomized (28 ARB and 29 PB). Forty-two percentage of patients received prior Bev, and 23% were platinum-refractory. At futility analysis, the median PFS was 5.3 and 12.7 months for ARB and PB, respectively [P = 0.03; HR = 2.02 (1.06-3.86)]. The overall response rate was 21% with ARB and 65% with PB. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were anemia (18%) with ARB and neutropenia (24%) with PB. Higher baseline levels of circulating IL6 were associated with worse PFS, and its levels decreased with PB treatment.

conclusionsOur study stopped at interim analysis highlighting the benefit of PB in prrHGOC as the standard of care.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBevacizumabFemaleGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansMaytansineMesothelinMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPaclitaxelPlatinumBevacizumabGPI-Linked ProteinsMaytansineMesothelinPaclitaxelPlatinum

Identifiers

PMID39836408
PMCPMC11911801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.