Trial reportJAMA neurology2025
Prourokinase vs Standard Care for Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: The PUMICE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05507645 (Recombinant Human Prourokinase(rhPro-UK)for Injection Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Recombinant Human Prourokinase(rhPro-UK)for Injection Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke (NIHSS≤5) Within 4.5 Hours After Symptom Onset
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methods for Analyzing the Modified Rankin Scale in Stroke Thrombolysis Trials: A Systematic Review and Methodological Framework.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Safety Outcomes Following Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.CNS drugs · 2026Pooled it
- Intravenous thrombolysis versus antiplatelet standard care for patients with mild acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis versus standard medical management for minor stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Tenecteplase versus standard care for minor ischaemic stroke according to the baseline occlusion status in TEMPO-2 trial.European stroke journal · 2026Trial
- Article
- Thrombolysis in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Effectiveness Study From the Norwegian Stroke Registry.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Tirofiban Versus Alteplase for Patients With Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Target Trial Emulation Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Acute Treatment of Disabling and Nondisabling Minor Ischemic Stroke: Expert Guidance for Clinicians.Stroke · 2026Review
- Urokinase redux: route, compartment, access, and pharmacological evolution from native urokinase to recombinant prourokinase.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Alteplase treatment in patients with minor ischemic stroke: a nationwide registry analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Trials have not demonstrated superiority of alteplase or tenecteplase vs standard care in patients with mild stroke and have raised safety concerns. Prourokinase is an alternative fibrinolytic that may have a favorable safety profile, and the benefit-risk profile of prourokinase in mild stroke is unknown. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of prourokinase in mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, blinded-end point randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2022 through December 2023 with 3 months of follow-up. The trial was conducted at 89 hospitals in China. Patients with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5 or less (scores range from 0-42, with higher scores indicating more severe neurological deficit) within 4.5 hours from the time the patient was last known to be well. Patients with intention to proceed to endovascular treatment were excluded. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive prourokinase, 35 mg (15-mg bolus + 20-mg infusion over 30 minutes) or standard care, including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, at the discretion of local investigators. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 (range, 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at day 90. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. Results: Of 3836 patients who underwent screening, 1446 (37.7%) were enrolled in the trial. Median (IQR) age was 65.9 (57.7-72.7) years, and 948 were male (65.5%). A total of 723 patients were assigned to prourokinase and 723 to standard care. The primary outcome occurred in 639 patients (88.5%) in the prourokinase group and 658 (91.0%) in the standard care group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; 2-sided P = .12). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0.7% (5 of 723 patients) with prourokinase and 0% with standard care, and mortality at 90 days was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that prourokinase was not superior to standard care to improve the functional outcomes for patients with mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after symptom onset but had a similar safety profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05507645.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.