Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836393›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2025

Prourokinase vs Standard Care for Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: The PUMICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yunyun Xiong, Xia Meng, Aoming Jin, Bruce C V Campbell, Anding Xu, Qiang Dong, Yun Xu, Yuesong Pan, Yong Jiang, Siying Niu and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05507645 (Recombinant Human Prourokinase(rhPro-UK)for Injection Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05507645 phase3completednot on this map

Recombinant Human Prourokinase(rhPro-UK)for Injection Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke (NIHSS≤5) Within 4.5 Hours After Symptom Onset

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,446ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Mild, ThrombosisArmsRecombinant Human Prourokinase for Injection (rhPro-UK), standard medical treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Yunyun XiongDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xia MengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Aoming JinChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Bruce C V CampbellDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anding XuDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang DongDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yun XuDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yuesong PanChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yong JiangChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Siying NiuChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Zhiliang LiDepartment of Neurology, Huazhou People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Xianbo ZhuangDepartment of Neurology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Na GuoDepartment of Neurology, Tang County People's Hospital, Baoding, China.
Zhimei YuanDepartment of Neurology, Dongchang District People's Hospital of Tonghua, Tonghua, China.
Zhenyu KongNeurological Intensive Care Unit, Second People's Hospital of Jiaozuo, Jiaozuo, China.
Lixia ZongDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chunmiao DuanChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Zhixin CaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liyuan WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Manjun HaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuangzhe WuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xueyan FengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao LiChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Na WuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zixiao LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xingquan ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
PUMICE Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Trials have not demonstrated superiority of alteplase or tenecteplase vs standard care in patients with mild stroke and have raised safety concerns. Prourokinase is an alternative fibrinolytic that may have a favorable safety profile, and the benefit-risk profile of prourokinase in mild stroke is unknown. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of prourokinase in mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, blinded-end point randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2022 through December 2023 with 3 months of follow-up. The trial was conducted at 89 hospitals in China. Patients with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5 or less (scores range from 0-42, with higher scores indicating more severe neurological deficit) within 4.5 hours from the time the patient was last known to be well. Patients with intention to proceed to endovascular treatment were excluded. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive prourokinase, 35 mg (15-mg bolus + 20-mg infusion over 30 minutes) or standard care, including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, at the discretion of local investigators. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 (range, 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at day 90. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. Results: Of 3836 patients who underwent screening, 1446 (37.7%) were enrolled in the trial. Median (IQR) age was 65.9 (57.7-72.7) years, and 948 were male (65.5%). A total of 723 patients were assigned to prourokinase and 723 to standard care. The primary outcome occurred in 639 patients (88.5%) in the prourokinase group and 658 (91.0%) in the standard care group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; 2-sided P = .12). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0.7% (5 of 723 patients) with prourokinase and 0% with standard care, and mortality at 90 days was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that prourokinase was not superior to standard care to improve the functional outcomes for patients with mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours after symptom onset but had a similar safety profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05507645.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsIschemic StrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39836393
PMCPMC11894490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.